PERAN STRATEGI MILITER DAN MANUVER POLITIK DALAM SERANGAN UMUM 1 MARET 1949 DI YOGYAKARTA
Keywords:
General Offensive of March 1, 1949, military strategy, political maneuver, Indonesian War of IndependenceAbstract
The General Offensive of March 1, 1949, in Yogyakarta has often been portrayed primarily as a military achievement within Indonesia’s War of Independence. However, such interpretations tend to overlook its broader political function and strategic intent within the international diplomatic arena. This study aims to critically examine the General Offensive of March 1, 1949, as an integrated military–political strategy designed not merely to reclaim territory, but to counter Dutch claims of Republican collapse and to influence international opinion. Employing the historical method, this research is based on an in-depth analysis of archival documents, contemporary newspapers, military reports, and relevant secondary literature. A descriptive–analytical qualitative approach is used to compare Indonesian and Dutch narratives and to assess the interaction between military operations and political objectives. The findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of the General Offensive lay less in its temporary territorial control than in its symbolic and communicative impact. The operation functioned as a deliberate political signal aimed at international observers, reinforcing the continued existence and operational capacity of the Republic of Indonesia while undermining Dutch diplomatic narratives. This study argues that the General Offensive of March 1, 1949, should be understood as a strategic convergence of military action and political maneuvering rather than as a purely tactical success. By situating the offensive within its diplomatic and historiographical context, the article contributes to a more nuanced understanding of Indonesian military history and highlights the importance of political objectives in revolutionary warfare.
References
Achmad Faris Fizabillah, Silvia Damayanti, & Muhammad Yasin. (2024). Strategi Pendekatan Historis Dan Pragmatis. Trending: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi, 2(3), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.30640/trending.v2i3.2676
Aprilzal, T. (2023). Sejarah Untuk Mendapatkan Pengakuan Kedaulatan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 12(2), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.21009/jps.122.02
Cipta, S. E. (2020). Menoedjoe Repoeblik Bangsawan Dalam Pusaran Kemerdekaan : The role of K.G.P.A.A. Paku Alam VIII & Sri Sultan HB IX in defending Indonesia’s Independence (1945-1949). Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 29–35.
Herlina, N., Sofianto, K., & Falah, M. (2023). The March 1st, 1949, general attack: A defining point of recognition of Indonesia’s Sovereignty. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2232566
Het Dagblad. (1948). Nederland Ontkent Competentie Van Veiligheidsraad. Het Dagblad, 1–6.
Het Nieuwsblad Van Het Zuiden. (1948). Djokja Werd Bezet, Soekarno c.s Geinterneerd Regering Zag Zich Verplicht Haar Vrijheid Van Handelen Te Hernemen. Het Nieuwsblad Van Het Zuiden, 1–4.
Hilal, S., Hendra, A., Legionosuko, T., & Risman, H. (2022). Universe War Strategy on the March 1, 1949 General Attack in Yogyakarta. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 1, 192–199. www.rsisinternational.org
Iman, K. F., Triharjanto, R. H., Wibowo, H. B., Asmoro, N., & Wulandari, T. (2023). Analysis Of Weapon Technology And Defense Resources Used In The Indonesian Guerrilla War 1945 – 1949. Santhet: Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2
Khaldun, I., & Suparjan, E. (2021a). Politik Diplomasi Masa Revolusi Menuju Pengakuan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (1946-1949). Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(1), 122–131.
Khaldun, I., & Suparjan, E. (2021b). Politik Diplomasi Masa Revolusi Menuju Pengakuan Kemerdekan Indonesia (1946-1949). Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(1), 122–131.
Kuntowijoyo. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Tiara Wicara.
Kusdiana, A. (2024). The Importance of Presenting Historical Sources in Historical Research Activities. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v3i2.67
Limburgsen Dagblad. (1948). Het Gebeid Van De Republik. Limburgsen Dagblad, 1.
Mangkusubroto, M. I., Jenderal, U., & Yani, A. (2023). Diplomasi Tentara Nasional Indonesia Era Presiden Soekarno. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 2491–2496.
Nasution, A. H. (1964). Pokok-pokok gerilya. PT Pembimbing Masa.
Permana, R. Y. (2020). A strategy to defend the independence of Republic of Indonesia year 1948-1949. Santhet: Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2
Putri, A. A., Nurjihan, F., Tarigan, C. B. B., & Febriana, I. (2024). Pengembangan Teks Laporan Penelitian Dalam Penyusunan Historiografi Sejarah. Kohesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 15–28. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/
Sanoesi, O. (1983). Replika sejarah Perjuangan Rakyat Yogyakarta Jilid 1. Dinas Sosial Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Seskoad TNI AD. (1990). Serangan Umum 1 Maret 1949 Di Yogyakarta Latar Belakang dan Pengaruhnya. PT Citra Lamtoro Gung Persada.
The Examiner. (1948). Dutch Renounce Truce: Swift Attack In Indonesia. The Examiner, 1–5. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page4669618
Triyanto, M., Saputra, B. E., Hafiz, A., Zidni, Z., & Suhupawati, S. (2024). Peranan Palang Merah Indonesia Cabang Yogyakarta pada Masa Perang Kemerdekaan II di Yogyakarta, 1948-1949. Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan Dan Inovator Pendidikan, 10(4), 734–752. https://doi.org/10.29408/jhm.v10i4.27483
Wasino, & Hartatik, E. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Sejarah Dari Riset Hingga Penulisan. Magnum Pustaka Utama.
Yudha Ismanto, T., Lutvie, E., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Comparative Strategy Analysis: Battle of Dien Bien Phu 1954 Vs General Attack 1 March 1949 Reflections on The History of Decolonization. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(4). http://jiss.publikasiindonesia.id/
Yuniarto, B., Kusumawardhan, T. A., Nurfadlilah, F., & Fahrezi, F. (2023). The Linggarjati Agreement Was A Diplomatic Effort To Maintain Indonesian Independence. Advances in Social Humanities Research, 1(12), 65–69.
Yuniyanto, T., Kurniawan, D. A., & Sutiyah. (2022). Revolution Political Changes In Yogyakarta 1945-1951. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 05(06), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2022.5607
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Universitas Negeri Surabaya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0




