THE COMPARISON OF LAWS ON CHILD LABOR INVOLVEMENT IN INDONESIA AND FRANCE AS SUBJECTS IN COMMERCIALIZED DIGITAL CONTENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/ijllir.v2i01.43271Keywords:
Pekerja Anak, Konten Digital, Perlindungan Anak, Perbandingan Hukum, Indonesia-PrancisAbstract
The development of the digital economy has created both opportunities and challenges in protecting
children's rights, particularly when children become the main subjects of monetized digital content. This
phenomenon has grown rapidly in countries such as Indonesia and France, although their normative
responses differ significantly. This study aims to analyze and compare the legal frameworks in Indonesia
and France regarding the involvement of child labor in monetized digital content. Using a normative
and comparative legal approach, and drawing on functionalism, legal transplant, and legal convergence
theories, this research finds that Indonesia still faces normative ambiguity in this area, while France
has developed a more specific regulatory framework through Loi n° 2020-1266 and Loi n° 2023-566.
The study recommends the formulation of specific regulation in Indonesia that addresses the challenges
of the digital economy in relation to child protection, by referring to international best practices. These
findings are expected to contribute to national legal reform in the context of labor law and child rights
in the digital space.
References
Books:
Soekanto. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.
Siems, M. (2018). Comparative Law 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Watson, A. (1993). Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2nd ed. University of Georgia Press.
Zweigert, Konrad, and H. K. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law.
Journal:
ARCOM. (2022). Charte de la protection de l’enfance dans les medias numeriques.
CNIL. (2023). Protection des donnees des mineurs en ligne: Cadre et recommandations.
Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertes.
CSA. (2021). Conseil Superieur de l’Audiovisuel: Rapport d’activite.
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2011). https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en.
Undang-Undang:
France. (2016). Code du Travail.
France. (2020). Loi n° 2020-1266 du 19 octobre 2020 visant a encarder L’exploitation commerciale de l’image d’enfants de moints de seize ans sur les plateformes en ligne.
France. (2023). Loi n° 2023-566 du 7 juillet 2023 renforçant la protection des enfants influenceurs.
Labour Organization, I. (1973). ILO Convention No . 138 on the Minimum Age , ILO Convention No . 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labour , 1999. 138.
Le Defenseur des Droits. (2021). Protection des droits de l’enfant dans l’environnement numerique. Le Defenseur des Droits.
Republik Indonesia. (2002). Keputusan Presiden No. 59 Tahun 2002 tentang ILO Convention No. 138.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. In Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/43013/uu-no-13-tahun-2003
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2025 tentang Tata Kelola Penyelenggaraan Sistem Elektronik dalam Pelindungan Anak.
Tenaga, M., Dan, K., & Republik, T. (2003). KEPUTUSAN MENTERI TENAGA KERJA DAN TRANSMIGRASI REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR : KEP. 235 /MEN/2003 TENTANG JENIS-JENIS PEKERJAAN YANG MEMBAHAYAKAN KESEHATAN, KESELAMATAN ATAU MORAL ANAK.
Tenaga, M., Dan, K., & Republik, T. (2004). Menteri tenaga kerja dan transmigrasi republik indonesia. 1–4.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General Comment No. 25 (2021) on Children’s Rights in Relation to the Digital Environment.
UNICEF; UN Global Compact; Save the Children. (2012). Children’s Rights and Business Principles.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 0
