ANALISIS YURIDIS PENCABUTAN HAK IMUNITAS JAKSA DALAM PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 15/PUU-XXIII/2025
Keywords:
Prosecutorial Immunity, Constitutional Court, Equality Before the Law, Rule of Law, AccountabilityAbstract
This study analyzes the juridical implications of the revocation of prosecutorial immunity following Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XXIII/2025 from the perspectives of the rule of law and the principle of equality before the law. Prosecutors play a crucial role in the criminal justice system and require legal protection to maintain their independence in performing official duties. However, immunity may hinder accountability and create unequal legal treatment. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data are analyzed through legal interpretation of legislation, court decisions, and legal doctrines. The findings reveal that prosecutorial immunity is a form of limited functional immunity rather than absolute protection. The requirement to obtain approval from the Attorney General before initiating legal proceedings against a prosecutor may create conflicts of interest, delay law enforcement, and increase the risk of impunity. The Constitutional Court’s decision seeks to balance prosecutorial independence with accountability and equal treatment before the law. Accordingly, a more limited immunity framework, stronger oversight mechanisms, and clear exceptions are necessary to uphold the rule of law and ensure legal certainty.
References
Agustian, S. L. (2019). Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Sebagai Batu Uji Bagi Hakim Dalam Memutus Sengketa Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 2(2), 1–10.
Ari, E. A., Suwito, S., Sari, L., Irsan, I., & Faharudin, F. (2025). Kekebalan Kejaksaan Dalam Perspektif Konstitusi: Analisis Putusan MK No. 15/PUU-XXIII/2025. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(11), 7173–7183. Https://Doi.Org/10.56338/Jks.V8i11.9290
Ayu, S., Dkk. (2025). Etika Profesi Jaksa Dalam Penegakkan Hukum. Jurnal Jembatan Hukum, 1(2), 121–135.
Coenen, M. (2013). Constitutional Privileging. Virginia Law Review, 99(4), 683–752. Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/23528878
Departemen Teknik Planologi ITB. (2004). Keterkaitan Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Dalam Pencapaian Good Governance. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 15(1), 34–47.
Dicky Eko Prasetio, Muh. Ali Masnun, Arinto Nugroho, Denial Ikram, N. (2024). Discrimination Related to Labour Age Limitation in Indonesia : A Human Rights and Comparative Law Perspective. Suara Hukum, 6(2), 228–254.
Galley, R., Dkk. (2025). Good Governance Dan Akuntabilitas Pejabat Publik Dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara. Journal Of Public Administration And Governance, 15(1), 45–60.
Gunawan, A., Arthanaya, I. W., & Suryani, L. P. (2019). Fungsi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(1), 28–33.
Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance. Universitas Trisakti.
Haikal, M. F. (2022). Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Dalam Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus Pelayanan E-KTP Di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar). Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 28(2), 89–112.
Hananto Widodo, Muh. Ali Masnun, Intan Lovisonnya, Dicky Eko Prasetio, N. (2026). Legal Reconstruction of Strengthening the Function of Regional Representation in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 7(2), 517–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v7i2.43520
Jabar, S., Dkk. (2024). Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 12(2), 720–728.
Maolani, D. Y., Nuraeni, A. S., Dellyani, A., & Al Huda, E. F. (2023). Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Publik Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 21(2), 173–185.
Marbun, S. F. (2012). Hukum Administrasi Negara I. FH UII Press.
Muh. Ali Masnun, D. E. P. (2026). Reconstruction of The Concept of Authority in Administrative Law Related to National Strategic Projects Based on Substantive Justice. Mimbar Keadilan, 19(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v19i2.133399
Purbopranoto, K. (1994). Beberapa Catatan Hukum Tata Pemerintahan Dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Alumni.
Rahmatullah, M. Y. S. (2026). Hak Imunitas Jaksa Dalam Penindakan Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 [Skripsi, Universitas Sam Ratulangi].
Silalahi, M. (2020). Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB) Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 8(2), 115–130.
Sitorus, R. (2019). Konsep Freies Ermessen Dalam Akuntabilitas Administrasi Dan Hukum Atas Keputusan Administrasi Pejabat Pemerintahan. Jurnal Law Pro Justitia, 4(2), 64–87.
Widjana, S. A., Suntana, I., & Alamsyah, T. (2026). Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Nomor 15/PUU-XXIII/2025 Tentang Penghapusan Hak Imunitas Jaksa Dalam Penangkapan Jaksa Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maulidan arisiwi, Hananto Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 253
,
PDF Downloads: 5
