Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law is a peer reviewed journal published biannual (------) by Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. IJCL published both Printed and Online version (Print ISSN..... Online ISSN.....). IJCL is intended to be the journal for publishing of results of research on law both empirical and normative study, especially in contemporary legal issues. The various topics but not limited to, criminal law, constitutional law, private law, economic law, human rights law, international law, tax law, Islamic law, customary law, commercial business law, environmental law, street law, legal education, maritime law, trade law, in the framework of Indonesian legal systems and Indonesian legal studies. Title : Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law (IJCL) Editor in Chief : Citation Analysis : DOI Prefix : Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Surabaya Frequency
TINJAUAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP DINAMIKA PENERAPAN HUKUM DARURAT DAN PEMBATASAN HAM DI THAILAND SELATAN DAN ACEH
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika penerapan hukum darurat serta pembatasan hak asasi manusia (HAM) di Thailand Selatan dan Aceh dalam tinjauan hukum internasional. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang- undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif, serta mengacu pada instrumen hukum internasional seperti International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Convention Against Torture (CAT), dan prinsip-prinsip Siracusa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum internasional memperbolehkan pembatasan HAM dalam kondisi darurat, namun harus memenuhi prinsip legalitas, proporsionalitas, kebutuhan, dan non-diskriminasi, serta bersifat sementara. Penerapan hukum darurat di Thailand Selatan cenderung tidak memenuhi prinsip-prinsip tersebut, terutama terkait akuntabilitas, proporsionalitas, dan jangka waktu penerapan yang berkepanjangan, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan pelanggaran HAM. Sebaliknya, Indonesia menunjukkan perkembangan yang lebih progresif melalui penyelesaian konflik Aceh dengan pendekatan dialog dan rekonsiliasi, yang lebih sejalan dengan standar hukum internasional. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya pengawasan yang ketat, transparansi, serta pendekatan berbasis hak asasi manusia dalam penerapan kebijakan keamanan guna mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dalam situasi darurat. Kata Kunci: Hak Asasi Manusia; Hukum Darurat; Hukum Internasional; Konflik Separatis
Copyright (c) 2026 Jefudel Kalupea, Irfa Ronaboyd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
PERAN PENGAWASAN DPRD KOTA SURABAYA DALAM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK PENGELOLAAN AIR BERSIH ANTAR PDAM SURYA SEMBADA DENGAN PENGEMBANG PERUMAHAN ELIT
This study examines the dynamics of water resource governance in Surabaya, focusing on the conflict of interest between PDAM Surya Sembada and elite housing developers in West and South Surabaya. The research is driven by the phenomenon of independent water management by developers, which remains unintegrated with the PDAM network. This practice raises critical legal concerns regarding Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, creates service disparities between elite residents and the general public, and threatens Regional Original Income (PAD). Using a qualitative approach involving hearing mechanisms and field observations, the study analyzes the conflict’s regulatory, economic, and technical roots while evaluating the Surabaya City DPRD’s supervisory effectiveness. The findings reveal that while developers seek to maintain exclusive service standards, such autonomy violates principles of social justice and state water sovereignty. In response, the DPRD’s Commission A facilitated mediation through Public Hearings (RDP). The study concludes that the enactment of Surabaya City Regulation No. 1 of 2025 serves as a strategic solution, mandating service integration into the PDAM network to ensure community rights and legal certainty in public utility management. Keywords: DPRD Supervision, Water Management Conflict, PDAM Surya Sembada, Elite Housing Developer, Social Justice
Copyright (c) 2026 Wanda Wanda Thimas Tri Mareta, Intan Lovisonnya http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 143/PID.B/2019/PN SBS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PELAKSANAAN PERKAWINAN TANPA IZIN ISTRI SAH MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA
Obtaining consent from the first wife is a mandatory requirement for polygamy in Indonesia; this requirement must be fulfilled in accordance with statutory provisions. Conducting a subsequent marriage without the legal wife's consent is a punishable offense under Article 279 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, as seen in Case Decision Number 143/Pid.B/2019/PN Sbs. In this case, the defendant, Kurnia, entered into a marriage with Doni Friansyah without the knowledge or consent of Doni's first wife. The Public Prosecutor charged Kurnia using a single indictment under Article 279 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code. This study aims to determine whether the defendant's actions aligned with the elements of the charged article and whether the prosecution's legal qualification was appropriate. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and case approaches, the results indicate that the defendant's actions did not meet the elements of Article 279 paragraph (1) 1st, as she was not previously bound by marriage. The defendant's actions should have more appropriately been qualified under Article 279 paragraph (1) 2nd of the Criminal Code. Kata kunci : Judge's Verdict, Marriage Without Wife’s Consent, Prosecutor’s Indictment
Copyright (c) 2026 Nia Ramadhanty Purwanto, Pudji Astuti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0