Artificial Intelligence (AI), Copyrights, Critical Thinking, Higher-Order Thinking.


Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has progressed in leaps and bounds and has taken the world by storm with its seemingly endless potential applications that can have both positive and negative effects on society at large. Regulating a powerful and ever-evolving tool, however,  is a slippery slope with no consensus on how laws are applied to specific AI applications and how these will work in diverse contexts (Chauhan, 2022). The implications of regulations for generative AI are about as vast as its potential, and the lack of a comprehensive framework all the more highlights the difficulty in applying policies to varying contexts. It is essential, therefore, for higher education institutions to form a task force of faculty, faculty developers, and instructional designers to develop up-to-date guidelines and best practices through a Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis and warrant regulations that are aligned with their contexts while promoting higher order thinking and an understanding of copyright principles. Strategies and collaborations can be developed, thereby providing a range of perspectives on effective and responsible use of AI technology in education, fostering cooperation and educational opportunities, and ensuring ethical use and awareness of data privacy for educators and users alike.


Aljanabi, M., & ChatGPT. (2023). ChatGPT: Future directions and open possibilities. Mesopotamian Journal of Cyber Security, 2023, 16–17.

Analla, T. & Jonnavithula, A. (2023, March 6). Zarya of the Dawn: How AI is changing the landscape of copyright protection. JOLT Digest.

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., … Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative Futures on ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130.

Chauhan, K. D. S. (2022). From “what” and “why” to “how?”: An imperative driven approach to mechanics of AI regulation. Global Jurist. Advance online publication.

Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2022). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(2), 81–83.

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Advance online publication.

Ferrario, A., Loi, M., & Viganò, E. (2020). In AI we trust incrementally: A multi-layer model of trust to analyze human-artificial intelligence interactions. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 523–539.

Future of Life Institute. (n.d.). Cause area: Artificial intelligence. Retrieved June 6, 2023, from

Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). “I think this is the most disruptive technology”: Exploring sentiments of ChatGPT early adopters using Twitter data. arXiv.

Glaser, N. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as an educational technology: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication.

Manheim, K. M., Kaplan, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Risks to privacy and democracy. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 21(106), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-37.

Meltzer, J. P. (2023, May 22). The US government should regulate AI if it wants to lead on international AI Governance. Brookings.

Metz, C. (2023, April 4). What makes A.I. chatbots go wrong? The New York Times.

Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education.

Reed, C. (2018). How should we regulate Artificial Intelligence? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), Article 20170360.

Smith, C. G. (2023, March 13). Hallucinations could blunt ChatGPT’s success. IEEE Spectrum.

Stojanov, A. (2023). Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Art. 35.

Sundar, S., Schmit, C., Villasenor, J. (2023, April 3). Regulating AI: 3 experts explain why it’s difficult to do and important to get right. The Conversation.

UNESCO. (n.d.). Policy resources. UNESCO. Retrieved June 6, 2023, from

UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO Digital Library.

UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO survey: Less than 10% of schools and universities have formal guidance on AI. UNESCO.

U.S. Copyright Office. (2021). Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office practices § 101 (Third edition 2021).

Yudhoyono, S. B. & Syamsudin, A. (2014). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 on Copyrights. Retrieved August 29, 2023 from




How to Cite

Allen, T., Villaflor-Wilson, R., Muljana, P., & Romero-Hall, E. (2024). AI-GENERATED CONTENT: GUIDELINES, HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS, AND COPYRIGHTS. Educational Technology Journal, 4(1), 1–5. Retrieved from
Abstract views: 187 , PDF Downloads: 134