PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STAD, TGT, DAN KOMBINASI STAD-TGT DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA TKR KELAS XI PADA MATA PELAJARAN PKKR

Authors

  • Bunga Rahmania Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Ikhsanudin Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Sulaeman Deni Ramdani Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Keywords:

Experiment, Learning Acheivement, STAD, TGT, STAD-TGT Combination

Abstract

This study is aiming to compare learning achievement of the students with the STAD, TGT, and STAD-TGT combination models. This research is quasi-experimental research. The samples used were 3 classes from SMKN 1 Ciruas and SMK PGRI 1 Serang. Data collection using test and observation sheets of student activity. Data analysis techniques used descriptive analysis, normality test and homogeneity test, as well as hypothesis testing. The results of the study were obtained through descriptive analysis with an average learning achievement using the STAD model is 58.33, TGT model is 54.47, and STAD-TGT combination model is 65.29. Descriptively, the learning achievement category in STAD-TGT combination model is higher than two other models. Based on the descriptive analysis it was concluded that the learning outcomes of the STAD-TGT combination model obtained the highest average score. However, this difference was not significant, as evidenced by the Tukey HSD test which resulted in the STAD-TGT combination model with the STAD model (sig. 0.447), while the difference occurs significantly between the STAD-TGT combination model and the TGT model (sig. 0.027). The conclusion in this study is that the STAD-TGT combination model is sequentially better in improving student learning outcomes in class XI TKR.

Keywords: experiment; learning acheivement; STAD, TGT, STAD-TGT combination.

References

Aka, K. A. (2015). Komparasi Penerapan Model STAD dan TGT Hasil Belajar dan Aktivitas Siswa (Studi pada Siswa Kelas V Mata Pelajaran di SDN Bendo 1, Kec. Pare, Kab. Kediri. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 103–111.

Andi Setiawan, M. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Belajar_dan_Pembelajaran/CPhqDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=belajar+dan+pembelajaran+andi+setiawan&pg=PR1&printsec=frontcover

Butar-Butar, N., Mursid, R., & Tanjung, S. (2022, December 9). The Effect of STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model with TGT Type and Achievement Motivation on Economic Learning Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-9-2022.2324807

Elisa, E. (2021, May 31). Permasalahan dalam Pendidikan Kejuruan. https://educhannel.id/blog/artikel/permasalahan-dalam-pendidikan-kejuruan.html

Handayani, S. (2019). Pembelajaran Speaking Tipe STAD yang Interaktif Fun Game Berbasis Karakter (Fungky, Ed.; 1st ed.). Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Buku_Model_Pembelajaran_Speaking_Tipe_ST/NDWODwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1

Hasmyati, & Suwardi. (2018). Experimentation of Cooperative Learning Model STAD-TGT Type against Students’ Learning Results. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012090

Kemdikbud. (2018, February 1). Terobosan Model Pembelajaran di SMK. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/02/terobosan-model-pembelajaran-di-smk#:~:text=Tujuan%20pendidikan%20di%20SMK%20adalah,percepatan%20dan%20peningkatan%20kompetensi%20siswa.

Marfuah, I. (2016). Pendidikan Kejuruan.

Melac, M. (2022, February 24). Why is Learning Important? A Deep Dive Into the Benefits of Being a Lifelong Learner. https://www.learnerbly.com/articles/why-is-learning-important

Muldayanti, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran Biologi Model STAD dan TGT ditinjau dari Keingintahuan dan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 12–17. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii

Nurcahyo, A., & Arif, S. N. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ARIAS diintegrasikan dengan Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD. Global Aksara Pers.

Parimita, W., Widyastuti, U., & Lestari, M. N. (2012). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT dan Dikombinasikan dengan Tipe STAD pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Kelas X SMK Karya Ekopin di Jakarta Timur.

Rosyada, D. (2016, August 25). Antara Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. https://www.uinjkt.ac.id/antara-pendidikan-dan-pembelajaran/

Rusman. (2016). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. Rajawali Press.

Rusyanto. (2021). TGT (Teams Game Tournament) dalam Pembelajaran IPS. Penerbit NEM. TGT (Teams Game Tournament) dalam Pembelajaran IPS

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Nusa Media.

Triwiyanto, T. (2015). Manajemen Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (Y. Nur Indah Sari, Ed.). PT Bumi Aksara. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Manajemen_Kurikulum_dan_Pembelajaran/GeNwEAAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=Manajemen+Kurikulum+dan+Pembelajaran+triwiyanto+2015&pg=PR4&printsec=frontcover&bshm=bshwcqp/1

Usman Aje, A. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) & Team Games Tournament (TGT) (Safrinal, Ed.). CV AZKA PUSTAKA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=VjB-EAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Veloo, A., & Chairhany, S. (2013). Fostering Students’ Attitudes and Achievement in Probability Using Teams-games-tournaments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.152

Yanuarti, A., & Sobandi, A. (2016). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 11–18. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmanper/article/view/00000

Published

2023-10-11

How to Cite

Rahmania, B., Ikhsanudin, & Sulaeman Deni Ramdani. (2023). PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STAD, TGT, DAN KOMBINASI STAD-TGT DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA TKR KELAS XI PADA MATA PELAJARAN PKKR . Educational Technology Journal, 3(2), 33–39. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/etj/article/view/26414
Abstract views: 75 , PDF Downloads: 85