REVEALING ONLINE TOXICITY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PROMOTIONAL CONTENT BY A SINGLE TIKTOK AND YOUTUBE INFLUENCER

Authors

  • Erica Christiana Universitas Widya Kartika
  • Endar Rachmawaty Linuwih Universitas Widya Kartika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v6n3.p113-129

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Influencer, Online Toxicity, Toxic Behavior

Abstract

Social media has become one of the primary platforms through which individuals communicate, express opinions, and construct online identities. Although these platforms support freedom of expression, they also enable harmful communication, including online toxicity. Social media influencers, given their large audiences and persuasive reach, play an important role in shaping online behavior and discourse. This study examines how online toxicity is discursively constructed and promoted in the content of a single TikTok and YouTube influencer, referred to as Jazmine, based on a corpus of six videos: five uploaded directly by the influencer and one obtained from a third-party commentary channel. The analysis draws on Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine three interconnected dimensions: the textual features of Jazmine's videos, the processes of content production and audience interaction, and the broader sociocultural context in which the discourse is produced and consumed. Particular attention is given to linguistic choices, rhetorical strategies, and communicative patterns that contribute to the construction and normalization of toxic behavior. The findings indicate that Jazmine's content displays recurring instances of derogatory language, mockery, provocation, and hostile expression framed as humor or entertainment, and that these discursive strategies appear designed to encourage audience engagement while presenting aggressive communication as acceptable online behavior. As a single-case study, these findings illustrate rather than generalize how influencer-generated content can reinforce toxic discourse by framing harmful interactions as entertaining and socially rewarding. The study contributes to Critical Discourse Analysis and digital media studies by highlighting the role of social media personalities in shaping online communication and by underscoring the need for digital literacy and responsible content creation.

References

Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 13(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.00

Awaliah, Y. R., Kosasih, D., Widyastuti, T., Sutisna, A., & Hendrayana, D. (2024). The language realization of the role of women as anthropocentric subjects in Sundanese culture. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i2.74902

Bishop, S. (2022). Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077083

Casale, S., Gemelli, G., Calosi, C., et al. (2021). Multiple exposure to appearance-focused social media content and body image concerns: A systematic review. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01826-4

Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Côté, J. E. (2005). Identity capital, social capital and the wider benefits of learning: Generating resources facilitative of social cohesion. London Review of Education, 3(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460500372382

Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2016). Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Haidar, S., Nur Az Zahra, F., & Radhwa Abiyyu, N. (2023). Dampak objektifikasi tubuh bagi perempuan melalui media sosial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 1328–1335.

Hanscom, R., Lehman, T. S., Lv, Q., & Mishra, S. (2024). The toxicity phenomenon across social media. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21589

Irawati, I., Hasgimianti, H., Raja, R., & Fitra, H. (2024). Women on social media: A representation of self-actualization and social embarrassment. Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v10i1.20720

Leon, C. Y., & Schmidt, E. (2021). Women equity strive in society depicted through animation film characters. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 3(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v3i2.4818

Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the Family Stress Model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008

Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of racist discourse on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130

Moore, A., & Stathi, S. (2020). The impact of feminist stereotypes and sexual identity on feminist self-identification and collective action. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1644280

Nahdliyah, N. L., & Robot, M. (2024). Gender inequality and media representation: A critical discourse analysis of femicide coverage in Indonesia. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 4(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v4i2.959

Nurhabibah, P., Hetilaniar, H., Santoso, B. W. J., & Rustono, R. (2023). A multimodal critical discourse analysis of TikTok FYP video. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i2.829

Padilla Cruz, M. (n.d.). Chapter two: What do interjections contribute to communication and how are they interpreted? A cognitive pragmatic account. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352197588

Parahita, G. D. (2019). The rise of Indonesian feminist activism on social media. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 4(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v4i2.331

Phitaloka, M., & Purwaningtyas, F. (n.d.). Indonesian women's activism in Instagram.

Prasetyaningrum, D. A., & Ahdiani, U. (2024). The intersectionality of gender discrimination impact on Beth Harmon’s identity development in The Queen’s Gambit. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 6(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i2.10522

Saeed, L., & Khan, S. I. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of language and visuals in beauty advertisements. Global Digital & Print Media Review, 5(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2022(v-ii).04

Sampe, M. D. (2022). Rejection against the patriarchal society in Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos' Beauty and the Beast. Journal of Language and Literature, 22(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.3582

Sheth, A., Shalin, V. L., & Kursuncu, U. (2021). Defining and detecting toxicity on social media: Context and knowledge are key. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

Sophomore Talle Vacalares, A. F. R., Salas, B. J. S., Babac, A. L., Cagalawan, C. D., & Calimpong, C. D. (2023). The intelligibility of internet slangs between millennials and Gen Zers: A comparative study. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 9(1), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.9.1.0456

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Susanti, S. (2019). A critical discourse analysis on beauty product advertisements. Journal of Language Learning and Research (JOLLAR), 2(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.22236/jollar.v2i1.3493

Tiggemann, M., & Anderberg, I. (2020). Social media is not real: The effect of "Instagram vs reality" images on body image and self-esteem. Body Image, 34, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.06.005

Turhan, B. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of advertising: Implications for language teacher education. International Journal of Languages' Education, 5(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2301

Walia, B. (n.d.). Toxicity in the digital age: A review of literature on online toxic behaviors and social media platforms. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15541.08165

Wijesiriwardene, T., Inan, H., Kursuncu, U., Gaur, M., Shalin, V. L., Thirunarayan, K., Sheth, A. P., Budak Arpinar, I., & Sheth, A. (2020). ALONE: A dataset for toxic behavior among adolescents on Twitter. University of South Carolina. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/aii_fac_pub

Yan, J., Xia, S., Jiang, A., & Lin, Z. (2024). The effect of different types of virtual influencers on consumers’ emotional attachment. Journal of Business Research, 177, Article 114646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114646

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Christiana, E., & Linuwih, E. R. (2026). REVEALING ONLINE TOXICITY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PROMOTIONAL CONTENT BY A SINGLE TIKTOK AND YOUTUBE INFLUENCER. ELite Journal : International Journal of Education, Language and Literature, 6(3), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v6n3.p113-129
Abstract views: 1 , PDF Downloads: 13