The Impact of Feedback in The Process of Peer Assessment on Students Recount Writing

Authors

  • Nur Laili Indasari Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Oikurema Purwati Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v1n1.p%25p

Abstract

Providing feedback to peers writing is not an easy task. It is required an ability to deliver the feedback or comment critically and a competence to master the knowledge of writing. Therefore, the present study is going to explore the impact of giving feedback to the students writing and to acknowledge what the students challenge while giving feedback to their peers writing. There are 10 students as the participants of this study. Qualitative study assists the researchers to get the data. The results revealed that the comparison between students first draft and the last draft had improvements mainly on the aspect of the language use. Meanwhile, most students challenges while giving feedback to the peers writing were they had to have knowledge about the grammar mainly the use of simple past tense before giving feedback to their peer.   

Keywords: writing, peer assessment, feedback, challenge

References

Azarnoosh, M. 2013. Peer Assessment in an EFL Context: Attitudes and Friendship Bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3 (11), 1-10.
Birjandi, P & Siyyari, M. 2010. Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment: A Comparative Study of Their Effect on Writing Performance and Rating Accuracy. IJAL, 13 (1), 23-42.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method (5th ed.). USA: Pearson.
Brown, S. et al. 1996. 500 Tips on Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Eksan, R. 2004. Improving Writing Ability of the Second Year Students of SLTPN 18 Malang through Process Writing. Thesis Unpublished. Malang: Postgraduate Program of State University of Malang.
Falchikov, N. 2007. The Place of Peers in Learning and Assessment. New York: Routledge.
Faudi. 2016. The Implementation of Peer Assessment Technique in Teaching Writing. English Education Journal (EEJ), 7 (3), 402-414.
Harmer, J. 2004. How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Longman.
Heaton, J.B. 1991. Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman.
Klimova, B. F. 2014. Constraints and Difficulties in The Process of Writing Acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 433-437.
Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Australia: A UNSW Press book.
Lin G.-Y., Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system, Computers & Education (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010.
Misianto. 2014. Improving Students Ability in Writing an Essay through Peer-Assessment Strategy at the Fifth Semester in Cipta Wacana Christian University of Malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 1 (1), 37-48.
Myles, J. 2002. Second Language Writing and Research: The Writing Process and Error Analysis in Student Texts. TESL-EJ, 6 (2). http://tesl-ej.org/ej22/a1.html
Puegphrom & Chiramanee. 2011. The Effectiveness of Implementing Peer Assessment on Students Writing Proficiency. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. Songkla UniversityPutra, Kristian A. (2014). The Implication of Curriculum Renewal on ELT in Indonesia. Parole, 4 (1), 63-75.
Suzuki, M. 2008. Japanese Learners Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (2), 209-233.
Weigle, S. C. 2002. Assessing Writing. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Xiao, Y. & Lucking, R. 2008. The Impact of Two Types of Peer Assessment on Students Performance and Satisfaction within a Wiki Environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 186-193.
Salah Satu Ragam Sastra Lisan Gorontalo. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-31

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carrefully read ELite Journal's Posting Your Article Policy at editorial policy
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with ELite Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

ELite Journal use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted, but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO,Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

Abstract views: 131 , PDF Downloads: 161