The Use of Social Media to Learn English for University Students

Authors

  • Darius Yonatan Nama Universitas Citra Bangsa

Keywords:

Perceptions , social media, benefits, English learning

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions, potential benefits, and challenges associated with the utilization of social media in English language learning, with a particular focus on English education students. 20 students participated voluntarily. This research applied a mixed-method research design by utilizing a questionnaire and interview. Positive aspects, such as real-life practice and connections with native speakers, coexist with divergent views on engagement, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. The mixed perception regarding its impact on motivation emphasizes the intricate nature of this educational medium. Identified challenges, encompassing distractions and language barriers, highlight the multifaceted nature of the experience. Positive perceptions, including maintaining focus and effective time management, provide a comprehensive understanding of learning English on social media. The diversity in perspectives underscores the need for a tailored approach to leveraging social media benefits for language education. Students' suggestions offer valuable strategies for mitigating challenges, ranging from improved data accessibility to a deliberate focus on educational content. Individualized recommendations, such as adaptive learning approaches and goal setting, provide practical avenues for educators and learners. The article emphasizes the importance of crafting educational strategies with a nuanced understanding of students' perceptions, contributing to the continual refinement of language education in contemporary digital landscapes.

References

Abe, P., & Jordan, N. A. (2013). Integrating Social Media into the Classroom Curriculum. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 18(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21107

Aljameel, I. H. (2022). Computer-Assisted Language Learning in Saudi Arabia: Past, Present, and Future. International Education Studies, 15(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v15n4p95

Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). Efl students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, lms, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Rzavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Batterton, K. A., & Hale, K. N. (2017). The Likert Scale What It Is and How To Use It. Source: Phalanx, 50(2), 32–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26296382

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (6th ed). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hasan, M. M., Al Younus, M. A., Ibrahim, F., Islam, M., & Islam, M. M. (2020). Effects of New Media on English Language Learning Motivation at Tertiary Level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(5), 17. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.5p.17

Khan, I. U., Khan, S. U., & Khan, M. U. (2020). Perceptions of Teachers Regarding Online In-Service Training in their Professional Development in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Global Educational Studies Review, V(I), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2020(v-i).06

Lutviana, R., & Mafulah, S. (2021). Boosting Students’ Confidence and Skill in Writing Using Social Media. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020), 542(Ancosh 2020), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210413.024

Mackey, A., & Gass, M. S. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mertens, M. D. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology; Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mills, Geoffrey E.; Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (12th ed.). Pearson

Mubarak, A. A. Al. (2016). Learning English as a Second Language through Social Media: Saudi Arabian Tertiary Context. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(6), 112. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i6.10449

Muftah, M. (2023). Impact of social media on learning English language during the COVID-19 pandemic. PSU Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-10-2021-0060

Paliath, G., & Evangeline, M. (2022). E-Learning and Social Media for ELT — Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.25

Rezaul Karim, M., Ali Mondal, S., Hussain, A., Alam, M., & Nazarieh, M. (2022). Social Media and Learning of English Language: A Study on the Undergraduate Students of Assam, India. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8238895

Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621

Tufail, S. (2021). An Investigation of ESL Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Networking Applications to Increase Motivation and Vocabulary Developmen. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(IV), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-iv)50

Zainal, Z., & Rahmat, N. H. (2020). Social Media and Its Influence on Vocabulary and Language Learning: a Case Study. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3331

Zam Zam Al Arif, T. (2019). the Use of Social Media for English Language Learning: an Exploratory Study of Efl University Students. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v3i2.1921

Published

2024-01-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): ELite Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Darius Yonatan Nama

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carrefully read ELite Journal's Posting Your Article Policy at editorial policy
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with ELite Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

ELite Journal use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing

The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted, but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.

Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO,Dryad, Dataverse, or others.

Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

Abstract views: 281