ATTITUDE AND MOTIVATION TOWARDS LEARNING ENGLISH AND KOREAN LANGUAGE OF THE KOREAN CULTURE ENTHUSIASTS IN SURABAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v2n3.p177-192Keywords:
language attitude, cognitive, affective, conative, learning motivationAbstract
This study aims to reveal the language attitudes of Korean culture enthusiasts in Surabaya and their motivations for learning English and the Korean language. It is in line with the increasing interest among the youth, especially in Surabaya, in learning foreign languages, together with the spread of the Korean wave. The data were collected by a questionnaire distributed to respondents who met the criteria of this study via WhatsApp, Instagram, and Twitter. Then, the data obtained were analyzed in different ways. To measure language attitudes, the data were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. As for learning motivation, the data were analyzed by grouping respondents' answers into motivation categories. The results indicate that the attitude of Korean culture enthusiasts in Surabaya towards English and the Korean language seen from the three components of attitude is included in the "Good" category or can be interpreted as a positive attitude. The slight difference is that their attitude towards English is greater than that of the Koreans. The researchers also find four categories of motivation of the respondents: integrative, instrumental, intrinsic, and extrinsic.
References
Alemán Jr, E. (2006). Is Robin Hood the "Prince of Thieves" 1 or a pathway to equity? Applying critical race theory to school finance political discourse. Educational Policy, 20(1), 113-142.
Beltrán, M. (2018). Representation. In The craft of criticism (pp. 97-108). Routledge.
Calder, T. (2003). The apparent banality of evil: The relationship between evil acts and evil character. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(3), 364-376.
Carlyle, T. (2001). On heroes, hero-workship, and the heroic in history by Thomas Carlyle, the Pennsylvania State University. Electronic Classics Series, Jum Manis, Faculty Editor, Hazleton, PA, 18201-1291.
Franco, Z. E., Blau, K., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Heroism: A conceptual analysis and differentiation between heroic action and altruism. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022672
Frisk, K. (2019). What makes a hero? theorising the social structuring of heroism. Sociology, 53(1), 87-103.
Gehrmann, R. (2019). War, snipers, and rage from Enemy at the Gates to American Sniper.
M/C Journal, 22(1).
Irawati, Y. (2010). Between civil liberty and national security in James Mcteigue'sv for Vendetta (2006): A sociological approach (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Jasper, J. M., Young, M., & Zuern, E. (2018). Character work in social movements. Theory and Society, 47(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9310-1
Kaufman, E. K., Rateau, R. J., Carter, H. S., & Strickland, L. (2012). What's context got to do with it? An exploration of leadership development programs for the agricultural community.
Krotov, A. A. (2021). Saint-Simon and Napoleon: The emperor's personality and the philosopher's worldview. Voprosy Filosofii, (3), 185-195.
Ott, B. L. (2010). The visceral politics of V for Vendetta: On political affect in cinema. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903554359
Su, M. (2019). Light, dark, and grey: Representation of hero in William Morris's the story of Sigurd the Volsung and the Fall of the Niblungs. Neophilologus, 103(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-018-9575-7
Voytilla, S. (1999). Myth and the movies: Discovering the mythic structure of 50 unforgettable films (p. 47). Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose,
D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00028
Weber, M. (1978). Ethnic groups. In New tribalisms (pp. 17-30). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Firda Aprillia Rizmadana, A. Dzo’ul Milal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carrefully read ELite Journal's Posting Your Article Policy at editorial policy
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with ELite Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
ELite Journal use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted, but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO,Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.