STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF USING ZOOM MEETING FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN TEACHING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL IN TIMES OF COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/elitejournal.v2n2.p108-115Keywords:
zoom meeting, online learning, English speaking skillAbstract
This article examines students’ perception of using Zoom Meeting for online learning in teaching English speaking skill. Qualitative descriptive method was used to find out students’ perception related to the use of Zoom Meeting during learning speaking. The data collection used was collected by creating a questionnaire that consisted of 15 statements. The questionnaire was distributed via Google Form. The participants of this study were students of English Education Department from Singaperbangsa Karawang University which is selected randomly about 9 students from second semester students. The result showed that the use of Zoom Meeting for online learning in teaching English speaking skills give positive and negative impacts. Zoom Meeting applications make them understand some speaking class learning materials easily. However, in the other case, most of the students were bored with the implementation of online classes and lost of motivation to study during the COVID-19 pandemic only.
References
Alabbasi, D., & Ed, D. (2018). Exploring teachers perspectives towards using gamification techniquesin e-learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2).
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States. Needham MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
Ashraf, H., Motlagh, F. G., & Salami, M. (2014). The impact of online games on learning english vocabulary by Iranian (low-intermediate) efl learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 286-291 . doi:https://doi.or/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.03.418
Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 55-78.
Brahma, I. A. (2020). Penggunaan Zoom Sebagai Pembelajaran Berbasis Online Dalam Mata Kuliah Sosiologi dan Antropologi Pada Mahasiswa PPKN di STKIP Kusumanegara Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal AKSARA, 6(2), 97-102. doi:10.37905/aksara.6.2.97-102.2020
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Asessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Longman.
Browne, E. (2005). Structural and pedagogic change in further and higher education: A case study approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 49-59.
Butler, F. A., Eignor, D., Jones, S., McNama, T., & Soumi, B. K. (2000). TOEF 2000 Speaking Framework: A Working Paper. Chicago Educational Testing Service.
Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.
Gerlich, R. N. (2005). Faculty perception of distance learning. Distance Education Report, 9(17), 8.
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? . The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2010.07.003
Keengwe, J., Kidd, T. T., & Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009). Faculty and technology: Implications for faculty training and technology leadership. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 23-28.
Lao, T., & Gonzales, C. (2005). Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students' experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 459-474.
Maggie, B. J., & Deniz, P. (2011). Podcasting as a Means of Improving Spanish Speaking Skills in the Foreign Language Classroom: An Action Research Study. Networks, 13(1), 1-18. Retrieved from http://journals.library.wisc.edu/index.php/networks/article/view/277
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the Gap between Learning and Instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 133-158.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle.
Park, H. R., & Kim, D. (2017). English language learners' strategies for reading online texts: Influential factors and patterns of use at home and in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 63-74. doi:10.1016/J.IJER.2017.01.002
Sellani, R. J., & Harrington, W. (2002). Addressing administrator/faculty conflict in an academic online environment. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 131-145.
Shadat, A., Sayem, M., Taylor, B., Mcclanachan, M., & Mumtahina, U. (2017). Effective use of Zoom technology and instructional videos to improve engagement and succes of distance students in Engineering. In AAEE2017 CONFERENCE, pp. 1-6.
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. In C. J Richards, & W. A Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching, pp. 204-211.
Urdan, T. A., & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier. WR Hambrecht Co.
Wegmann, S., & McCauley, J. (2008). Shouting through the fingertips: Computer-mediated discourse in an asynchronous environment. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2008, pp. 805-808.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nanda Amalia Putri, Maman Suryaman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carrefully read ELite Journal's Posting Your Article Policy at editorial policy
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with ELite Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
ELite Journal use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted, but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO,Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
Abstract views: 781
,
PDF Downloads: 1182
