Behavioral Accounting and the Humanization of Financial Practices in MSMEs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v17n2.p321-332Keywords:
Behavioral accounting; Ethics; Humanistic accounting; Productivity; Motivation; Risk perceptionAbstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This research investigates the implementation of behavioral accounting in micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Lumajang Regency, Indonesia, highlighting its function as a behavioral mechanism that amalgamates financial management with ethical, motivational, and social aspects. Methods: Employing a qualitative descriptive methodology, data were gathered via in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and documentation from government officials, MSME proprietors, field facilitators, and accounting scholars. The analysis utilized a thematic coding methodology to discern patterns of motivation, risk perception, and ethical awareness that impact accounting behavior and business productivity. Results/Findings: The results show that human behavior, not formal financial systems, is what drives MSMEs to use accounting practices the most. Three main factors motivation, risk perception, and ethics came to light as the most important ones that affect adaptive and reflective accounting behavior. These dimensions together create a pattern of behavior that boosts productivity not only by being financially efficient, but also by being morally disciplined and socially responsible. Conclusions: The research illustrates that behavioral accounting can function as a conduit between formal economic frameworks and sociocultural contexts, thereby advancing the theoretical evolution of behavioral-humanistic accounting. In practice, the study underscores the significance of behavior-based accounting education that incorporates moral and social consciousness into MSME empowerment initiatives. In theory, it broadens the application of behavioral accounting from corporate settings to community-based enterprises, supporting the humanistic perspective that sustainable productivity arises from ethical conduct and reflective awareness rather than solely from financial rationality.
References
Argyris, C. (1952). The impact of budgets on people. The Controllership Foundation, Inc.
Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.007
Bandura, A. (2019). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102925
Birnberg, J. G., Turopolec, L., & Young, S. M. (1983). The organizational context of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2–3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90025-1
Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2007). Psychology theory in management accounting research. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 1, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01003-8
Brown, J., & Hirst, M. (2018). Behavioral implications of management accounting and control systems: A research perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68–69, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.002
Burritt, R. L., & Christ, K. L. (2016). Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: A new revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y
Duska, R. F., Duska, B. S., & Ragatz, J. A. (2018). Accounting ethics (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gibson, K., & Fraser, M. (2020). Accounting for sustainability: The next steps. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 67–68, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102168
Ghazali, N. A. M., & Ismail, S. (2022). Ethical judgment among accountants: The role of moral reasoning and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04874-2
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.
Hopwood, A. G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 156–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/2489870
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Lako, A. (2018). Akuntansi syariah: Konsep dan paradigma. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Libby, T., & Thorne, L. (2021). The development of a measure of auditors’ virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04443-2
Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (2016). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press.
Lukka, K. (2010). The roles and effects of paradigms in accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.002
Maxwell, J. A. (2020). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mulyani, S., Arifin, Z., & Mulyana, A. (2022). The effect of financial literacy and digital transformation on MSME performance in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(4), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no4.0123
OECD. (2019). OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/34907e9c-en
Rahman, N. A., & Aziz, N. N. A. (2021). The role of ethical motivation in small business performance. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2020-0162
Rudiantoro, R., & Siregar, S. V. (2012). Quality of small and medium enterprise financial statements and the implementation of IFRS for SMEs in Indonesia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00067-2
Shields, M. D., & Young, S. M. (1994). Managing innovation costs: A study of cost consciousness behavior by R&D professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6(1), 175–196.
Sukoharsono, E. G. (2021). Humanistic accounting: Rekonstruksi teori dan praktik akuntansi berbasis nilai. Malang: UB Press.
Suryana, & Bayu, K. (2020). Kewirausahaan: Pendekatan praktik dan penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
Zhang, W., Zhao, X., & Wan, D. (2022). Ethical leadership and financial reporting quality among SMEs in Southeast Asia. Asian Business & Management, 21(4), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00154-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Retno Cahyaningati, Deni Juliasari, Selvia Roos Ana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 34
,
PDF Downloads: 7
