The Relevance of Social Factors and The Fraud Triangle Model Factors in Detecting Academic Fraud in Accounting Student: Perceptions of Indonesian Millennials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v17n1.p16-30Keywords:
Cheating behaviour; Fraud triangle model; Social Trust; Subjectiver NormsAbstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study aims to test social factors and the fraud triangle model can be the basis for detecting fraud by accounting students in Indonesia. Background Problems: Indonesia is a country with a large number of public and private universities with accounting study programmes among ASEAN countries. But, the number of professional accountants currently available is still unbalanced when compared to the number of companies in Indonesia. Research Methods: This research when viewed from the analysis approach can be classified into the type of quantitative research. The data analysis that will be carried out in this study is to use a statistical approach consisting of descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, model feasibility tests, and research hypothesis testing. Finding/Results: This research shows some important research results. First, the results of hypothesis testing show that the variables of pressure, opportunity, rationalisation, and social trust have a positive effect on behavioral intention to cheat. Second, the results of hypothesis testing show that the variables of pressure, opportunity, rationalisation, social trust, and behavioural intention to cheat have a positive effect on cheating behaviour. Third, the test results also show that pressure, opportunity, rationalisation, and social trust can lead to behavioral intention to cheat which in turn can lead to cheating behavior. Finally, the results of testing this hypothesis have not been able to prove the influence of subjective norms on behavioural intention to cheat and cheating behaviour.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211
Becker, D.A., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006). Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37
Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 182, 196-211.
Bucciol, A., Cicognani, S., & Montinari, N. (2020). Cheating in university exams: The relevance of social factors. International Review of Economics, 67(3), 319-338.
Choo, F., & Tan, K. (2008). The effect of fraud triangle factors on students’ cheating behaviors. Advances in Accounting Education, 9, 205-220
Dumpit, D.Z., & Fernandez, C.J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-16.
Dyer, J.M., Pettyjohn, H.C., & Saladin, S. (2020). Academic dishonesty and testing: how student beliefs and test settings impact decisions to cheat
Free, C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: A review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research
Harper, R., Bretag, T., & Rundle, K. (2021). Detecting contract cheating: Examining the role of assessment type. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(2), 263-278
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2020). Kode Etik Akuntan Indonesia
Lee, Y.C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e‐learning system. Online information review, 30(5), 517-541.
Said, J., Alam, M., Ramli, M., & Rafidi, M. (2017). Integrating ethical values into fraud triangle theory in assessing employee fraud: Evidence from the Malaysian banking industry. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 170-184.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly, 561-570
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478
www.idx.co.id
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hana Norhamida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 69
,
PDF Downloads: 74















