Substance over Form in Tax Compliance and Risk of Fraud in SelfAssessment System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v17n1.p80-91Keywords:
Subtance Over Form, Principles of Accounting & Taxation, Self-AssessmentAbstract
Objectives: This study explores the relationship between the accounting principle of substance over form and the self-assessment system in taxation, focusing on its implications for tax policy, fairness, and compliance. Method: Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, it examines literature published in English from 1999 to 2024, sourced from databases such as ProQuest, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, Sage Journals, Taylor & Francis Online, and Wiley Online Library, with specific keywords including “Substance,” “Self-assessment,” and “Tax Compliance.” The review applies criteria requiring open access, qualitative methods, and complete content from abstract to conclusion, covering journals, books, and other relevant references. Results: The findings highlight the significance of prioritizing the economic substance of transactions over their legal or formal appearance in determining tax obligations, while also raising critical concerns about taxpayer discretion in reporting based on transaction substance and its potential effects on compliance. Conclusion: Ultimately, the study emphasizes the importance of establishing a clear regulatory framework and strong government oversight to ensure tax justice and prevent unethical tax avoidance practices.
References
Anggraeni, Mariska Dewi. 2011. “Agency Theory Dalam Persperktif Islam Oleh: Mariska Dewi Anggraeni Jurusan Syariah STAIN Pekalongan.” Jhi 9(2):1–13.
Belnap, Andrew, Jeffrey L. Hoopes, Edward L. Maydew, and Alex Turk. 2024. “Real Effects of Tax Audits.” Review of Accounting Studies 29(1):665–700.
Bonazzi, Livia, and Sardar M. N. Islam. 2007. “Agency Theory and Corporate Governance: A Study of the Effectiveness of Board in Their Monitoring of the CEO.” Journal of Modelling in Management 2(1):7–23.
Calvo, Nuria, and Flora Calvo. 2018. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Multiple Agency Theory: A Case Study of Internal Stakeholder Engagement.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(6):1223–30.
Capper, David. 2006. “ Spectrum Plus in the House of Lords: The Victory of Substance over Form in Personal Property Security Law? .” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 6(2):447–66.
Cohen, Jeffrey R., Ganesh Krishnamoorthy, and Arnold M. Wright. 2008. “Form versus Substance: The Implications for Auditing Practice and Research of Alternative Perspectives on Corporate Governance.” Auditing 27(2):181–98.
Dhaliwal, Dan S., Merle Erickson, Mary Margaret Myers, and Monica Banyi. 2005. “Are Shareholder Dividend Taxes on Corporate Retained Earnings Impounded in Equity Prices?: Additional Evidence and Analysis.” SSRN Electronic Journal 1–63.
Fischer, Dov, Ortal Ellman, and Sholom Schochet. 2023. “The Decline of Substance over Form in Accounting.” Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium 13(3):373–90.
Hayes, Rick S., and C. Richard Baker. 2004. “Using a Folk Story to Generate Discussion about Substance over Form.” Accounting Education 13(2):267–84.
Holmen, Martin, John D. Knopf, and Stefan Peterson. 2008. “Inside Shareholders’ Effective Tax Rates and Dividends.” Journal of Banking and Finance 32(9):1860–69.
Isenbergh, Joseph, and Boris I. Bittker. 1982. “Musings on Form and Substance in Taxation.” The University of Chicago Law Review 49(3):859.
Karen C. Burke. 2011. “Reframing Economic Substance.” Virginia Tax Review 31:271.
Korzun, Vera. 2018. “Shareholder Claims for Reflective Loss: How International Investment Law Changes Corporate Law and Governance.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 40(1):189–253.
Lai, Ming Ling, Zalilawati Yaacob, Normah Omar, Norashikin Abdul Aziz, and Bee Wah Yap. 2013. “Examining Corporate Tax Evaders : Evidence from the Finalized Audit Cases.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 78(6):396–400.
Lamensch, Marie. 2017. “ The Principle of ‘Substance over Form’ with Respect to the Exercise of the Right to Deduct Input VAT – A Critical Analysis of the Barlis Jurisprudence .” World Journal of VAT/GST Law 6(2):129–37.
Leclerc, Ivor. 2013. “Whitehead ’ s Transformation of the Concept of Substance WHITEHEAD ’ S TRANSFORMATION OF.” 3(12):225–43.
Lederman, Leandra. 2010. “Digital Repository @ Maurer Law W ( h ) Ither Economic Substance ? W ( h ) Ither Economic Substance ?”
Macdonald, Graeme. 1991. “Substance, Form and Equity in Taxation and Accounting.” The Modern Law Review 54(6):830–47.
McGregor, John D. 2007. “Form over Substance.” Journal of Object Technology 6(8):9–17.
Olaoye, Clement Olatunji, and Ayodele Temitope Ekundayo. 2019. “Effects of Tax Audit on Tax Compliance and Remittance of Tax Revenue in Ekiti State.” Open Journal of Accounting 08(01):1–17.
Rizki, Imron. 2018. “Self Assesment Sistem Sebagai Dasar Pungutan Pajak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-‘Adl 11(2):81–88.
Sasongko, Dedy. 2020. “‘Substance Over Form’ Dalam Kehidupan.” Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Negara. Retrieved February 21, 2025 (https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13162/substance-over-form-dalam-kehidupan.html).
Shapiro, Susan P. 2005. “Agency Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 31:263–84.
Stan, Marius. 2018. “Emilie Du Châtelet’s Metaphysics of Substance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 56(3):477–96.
William, Albert. 2016. “Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/2022580.” 55(18):749–61.
Williams, Paul F. 2023. “The Decline of Substance over Form in Accounting: A Problematic Dichotomy.” Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium 13(3):391–402.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Danny Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 92
,
PDF Downloads: 58
