Peer Review Process


All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow the Focus Scope and Author Guidelines of this journal. In addition, the submitted manuscripts must fulfill scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope of this journal.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must be written in excellent and academic English. Non-native authors are encouraged to have their papers checked its grammar and clarity before submission. International Science Editing and Asia Science Editing can provide English language and copyediting services. The work must not have been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to check the similarity (please use Turnitin to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal using Turnitin software.

The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers from Peer-Reviewers Team. The reviewers give valuable scientific comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required), a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments on the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a blind review system.

The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by the Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board is required for consideration) according to reviewers' critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor and Editorial Board's final review, which considers peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by the Reviewer).

Editor in Chief will publish accepted articles, including assigning the article to the published issue by considering the sequence of accepted dates, the geographical distribution of authors, and a thematic issue.