Anxiety Level in Floor Kayang Gymnastics Learning

Authors

  • Hanum Izzul Hanan Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Lusiana Lusiana Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Syarifah Zahra Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Yudhi Purnama Univerrsitas Wahid Hasyim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ijok.v2n2.p89-94

Keywords:

anxiety; learning; bridge up

Abstract

Background: Observations in the field show that students are less comfortable and less confident when practicing the Kayang movement in floor gymnastics learning of physical education. This study aims to determine the level of anxiety learning bridge up floor gymnastics in class X students at SMA Negeri 8 Semarang with each factor.

Methods: This quantitative research uses a survey approach to obtain data with a questionnaire as the data collection instrument. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique, as many as 133 students were used as research samples.

Results: The results showed that the level of anxiety of students in learning gymnastics on the bridge up floor was influenced by psychological factors in the very low category of 9 students, low 34 students, 45 students moderate, 36 students high, and very high 9 students. While the anxiety level of physiological factors in the very low category is 14 students, the low category is 26 students, the medium category is 50 students, the high category is 36 students, and the very high category is 7 students.

Conclusions: Physical education teachers are expected to be able to use a variety of appropriate methods so that students are able to practice the bridge up movements in floor gymnastics comfortably and confidently.

 

References

Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian. PT Rineka Cipta.

Lusiana. (2019a). Biomechanic Bridge Up Analysis. International Journal Of Kinesiology and Physical Education, 51–57.

Lusiana, Y. P. (2019b). Kemampuan Soft Skills Guru Penjasorkes Kelompok Kerja MTS Jepara Tahun 2019. JOURNAL OF SPORT EDUCATION, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jope.2.1.1-9

Pasiak, T. (2009). Unlimited Potency Of The Brain: Kenali dan Manfaatkan Sepenuhnya Potensi Otak Anda tang Tak Terbatas. Penerbit Mizan.

Purnama, Y., & Ainun, M. (2021). Daya Tahan Otot Atlet UKM Olahraga Universitas Wahid Hasyim Tahun 2020. Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 7(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4420486

Purnama, Y., & Muhlisin, M. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kelincahan Pemain Ukm Sepakbola Universitas Wahid Hasyim Melalui Latihan Ladder Drill Tahun 2017. Sosio Dialektika, 3(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.31942/sd.v3i1.2194

Ramaiah, S. (2003). Kecemasan: Bagaimana Mengatasi Penyebabnya. Pustaka Populer Obor.

Sudaryo, Y., Efi, N. A. S., Medidjati, R. A., & Hadiana, A. (2019). Metode Penelitian Survei Online dengan Google Forms. Penerbit Andi.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan : (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D (Cetakan 21). Alfabeta.

Trismiati. (2004). Perbedaan Tingkat Kecemasan Antara Pria dan Wanita Akseptor Kontrasepsi Mantap di RSUP Dr . Sardjito Yogyakarta. Psyche.

Tysar. (2009). Pengertian Kecemasan. In Wordpress.

Published

2023-01-06

How to Cite

Hanan, H. I., Lusiana, L., Zahra, S., & Purnama, Y. (2023). Anxiety Level in Floor Kayang Gymnastics Learning. Indonesian Journal of Kinanthropology (IJOK), 2(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijok.v2n2.p89-94

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 174 , PDF Downloads: 214 , PDF Downloads: 15