Diskresi Kepolisian Diluar Pengadilan dalam Rangka Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian oleh Anak dalam Keluarga

Authors

  • Dody Hendra Hendra Magister Hukum Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v2n2.p134-153

Abstract

 

Constitution of the Republic Indonesia 1945 states that Indonesia is a state of law. It is affirmed that the Republic of Indonesia is based on law (rechstaat), not for power merely (machtstaat). Children are the next generation of the nation that must be protected by their rights, so that if there is a criminal act involving children, it should not end in a prison sentence but can be settled in a certain way outside the court. Based on the consideration, the author disscuses this journal with the title "Discretion of Police outside the Court in the settlement of theft cases by children in the family". The problem of the study is about how the application and effectiveness of Police Discretion outside the Court in resolving theft cases by children in the family. In this research, the authors used legal research with an empirical juridical approach by using primary data sources obtained from interviews with National Police investigators and secondary data sources obtained by searching literature such as laws, books and legal dictionaries. The research method used isqualitative data analysis to obtain descriptive analytical data from the sources of data obtained. The conclusion is that there is no regulation which becomes the legal basis for the National Police to settle criminal cases by applying Restorative Justice approaches, especially in the crime of theft committed by child.

         

Keywords: Discretion, Court, Police, Theft, child

Author Biography

Dody Hendra Hendra, Magister Hukum Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA)

Bekerja di TNI AL dan berkuliah di Magister Hukum UNiversitas Surabya

References

Buku

Romli Atmasasmita, Reformasi Hukum– Hak Asasi Manusia & Penegakan Hukum, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2001;

DR. Marlina, S.H., M.Hum., Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Bandung, PT. Refika Aditama:2012;

Topo Santoso, S.H., M.H., Eva Achyani Zulfa, S.H., Kriminologi; Depok, 2015, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada;

Prof. Dr. Jur. Andi Hamzah, Delik– Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) didalam KUHP, PT. Sinar Grafika; Jakarta, 2016;

Prof. Dr. H. R. Abdussalam, SIK, S.H., M.H., Adri Desasfuryanto, S.H., M.H., Hukum Perlindungan Anak, PTIK, Jakarta, 2016.

Undang- undang

Undang– Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945;

Undang– Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia;

Undang– Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem peradilan anak;

Undang– Undang Nomor 81 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana;

Undang– Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan;

Undang– Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas - Undang- Undang Nomor 23 Thaun 2002 tentang Peradilan Anak;

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang pedoman pelaksanaan diversi dan penanganan anak yang belum berumur 12 (dua belas) tahun;

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Peraturan Disiplin Anggota Polri;

Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2013 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia;

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang pedoman pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak;

Surat Kapolri No Pol: B/3022/XII/2009/SDEOPS, tanggal 14 Desember 2009 tentang Penanganan Kasus Melalui Alternatif Dispute Resolusion (ADR);

Keputusan Kapolri Nomor: Kep/972/X/2015 tanggal 6 Nopember 2015 tentang Norma Indeks di lingkungan Polri;

Downloads

Published

2020-09-20

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 43 , PDF Downloads: 126