Constitutional Internet Blocking: Sebuah Upaya Preemtif terhadap Digital Authoritarian dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Demokratis
Abstract
The government have issued numerous internet blocking when there are no explicit rules regarding them, such as sources of authority, criteria, deadline, Legal attempt, and so forth. Based on that, the formulation of the problems in this article are first, how is the internet blocking in a perspective of the state of democratic law? Second, how is the constitutional internet blocking mechanism? As for the purposes in this article are first, analyzing internet blocking in the perspective of the state of democratic law and second, describing the constitutional internet blocking mechanism. The research method used in this article is a doctrinal research method with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The analysis results for this article are first, internet blocking in the state of democratic law are permissible but must not against the constitution, that is, should not against with the 1945 Constitution and the constitutional court ruling, and in accordance with the principle of human rights protection regulated in International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Second, as for the constitutional internet blocking mechanisms are formally expressed in the legal products of laws and materially will be regulated in conjunction with internet blocking procedures, legal subjects who can legally enforce internet blocking, Governments that can specifically implement internet blocking, criteria for internet blocking, deadline of internet blocking, and legal attempt against internet blocking.
Keywords: Constitutional Internet Blocking, Digital Authoritarian, Human Rights, State of Democratic Law.
References
ARTIKEL JURNAL
Adhari, A., Sitabuana, T., & Srihandayani, L. (2021). Kebijakan Pembatasan Internet di Indonesia: Perspektif Negara Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Kajian Perbandingan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 287.
Al Uyun, D. (2016). Sic Et Non : Kebebasan Dan Pembatasan Hak Kemudahan Dan Perlakuan Khusus. Yuridika, 31(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i1.1955
Arsil, F., & Ayuni, Q. (2020). Model Pengaturan Kedaruratan Dan Pilihan Kedaruratan Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(2), 429.
Faida, R. E. (2015). Sensor Internet dan Securitization di Era Cyberwarfare : Studi Kasus Tiongkok. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 1, 31–46.
Gusman, E. (2020). Lembaga Perwakilan Daerah Dalam Negara Demokrasi. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 2(2), 102–110.
Handayani, Y. (2014). 'Pengaturan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Konstitusi Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 7. Retrieved 17 May 2022, from https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/jurnal_online/PENGATURAN%20HAM%20DALAM%20KONSTITUSI%20%20%20INDONESIA%20DAN%20AS.pdf.
Maggalatung, A. (2015). Indonesia Negara Hukum Demokratis Bukan Negara Kekuasaan Otoriter. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v2i2.2379
Maziyah, D. S., & Nugraha, X. (2021). Komparasi Kewenangan Eksekutif Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pada Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensil: Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika. Jurnal Selat, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v8i1.2781
Nugraha, X., Adiguno, S., Yulfa, S., & Lathifah, Y. (2021). Analisis Potensi Legalisasi Eutanasia Di Indonesia : Diskursus Antara Hak Hidup Dengan Hak Menentukan Pilihan. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.6.1.39-59
Nugraha, X., Katherina, A. M. F., Agustin, W., & Pamungkas, A. (2019). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Formulasi Baru Upaya Stolen Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia. Majalah Hukum Nasional. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v49i1.92
Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. (2011), 10(1), 42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33061/1.jwh.2011.10.1.264
Pratama Putra, H. (2020). Penilaian Terhadap Batal atau Tidak Sahnya Suatu Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum PERATUN, 3, 39.
Ramadhan, F., Nugraha, X., & Felany, P. I. (2020). Penataan Ulang Kewenangan Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Ham Berat. Veritas et Justitia. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3514
Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Tanbun, E. P. (2021). Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122
Tanda, D. and Hanita, M. (2022). Analisis Pengambilan Kebijakan Perlambatan Internet Pada Konflik Papua Tahun 2019. Syntax Literate, 7(4), 4676.
Zoelva, H. (2012). Constitutional Question Dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Konstitusional. Jurnal Media Hukum, 19.
BUKU
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Hukum tata negara darurat. Rajawali Pers.
Declaration of Bangkok Conclusions and Resolutions. (1965). [Ebook] (p. 5). Retrieved 15 May 2022, from http://The International Commision of Yurist di Bangkok pada 1965.
Djafar, W., & Veda, J. (2014). Internet Untuk Semua, Mengintegrasikan Prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pengaturan Internet di Indonesia (p. 131). ELSAM.
Dragu, T., & Lupu, Y. (2020). Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights (p. 991). International Organization.
Kastika, I. (2013). Hak memilih TNI dalam pemilu (p. 3).
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.
Marshall, J., Goodman, J., Zowghi, D., & Da Rimini, F. (2015). Disorder and the Disinformation Society: The Social Dynamics of Information, Networks and Software (p. 1).
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi) (Edisi Revi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Moh. Mahfud M. D. (1999). Hukum dan pilar-pilar demokrasi (p. 221). Gama Media.
Pandoyo, T. (1983). Ulasan Terhadap Beberapa Ketentuan UUD 1945 (p. 98). Yogjakarta Liberty.
Rahayu, M. (2007). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan (p. 10). Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia (Grasindo).
Robertson, A., & Merrills, J. (1996). Human Rights In The World : An Introduction To The Study Of The International Protection Of Human Rights (p. 185). Manchester Univ. Press.
Sudibya, K. (2009). 10 [Sepuluh] Hak Yang Dilindungi Undang - Undang Hak Asasi Manusia Ri [Ebook] (p. 10). Unud Repository. Retrieved 14 May 2022, from https://erepo.unud.ac.id/id/eprint/14722/1/9a99fde69a203687ffd406e9c2f6d483.pdf
WEBSITE
Jemadu, L. (2022). APJII: Pandemi COVID-19 Tingkatkan Kebutuhan Internet di Indonesia. suara.com. Retrieved 16 May 2022, from https://www.suara.com/tekno/2022/02/11/232529/apjii-pandemi-covid-19-tingkatkan-kebutuhan-internet-di-indonesia.
Oktaryal, A. (2020). Analisis: masalah-masalah hukum mendasar dalam penetapan keadaan darurat oleh Jokowi. The Conversation. Retrieved 17 May 2022, from https://theconversation.com/analisis-masalah-masalah-hukum-mendasar-dalam-penetapan-keadaan-darurat-oleh-jokowi-136044.
Teori Negara Hukum Demokratis. (2022). [Blog]. Retrieved 16 May 2022, from https://bantuanhukum-sbm.com/tentang-kami.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945
TAP MPR Nomor XVII/MPR/1998
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1970 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat Di Muka Umum
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia
Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi
Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2004 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik
Undang-Undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation of Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
PUTUSAN PENGADILAN
Putusan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-JKT
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 011-017/PUU-I/2003
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14-17/PUU-V/2007
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 4/PUU-VII/2009
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 81/PUU-XVIII/2020
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Nugraha, Angeline Regita Nathalia, Melva Emely Laurentius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Jurnal Suara Hukum with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
Abstract views: 135
,
PDF Downloads: 178
