Keadilan Substantif Dalam Proses Asset Recovery Hasil  Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Ade Mahmud; Chepi Ali Firman Z; Husni Syawali; Rizki Amrulloh; Weganisa

doi:10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p227-250

Authors

Ade Mahmud Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Bandung
Chepi Ali Firman Z Universitas Islam Bandung
Husni Syawali Universitas Islam Bandung
Rizki Amrulloh Universitas Islam Bandung
Weganisa Universitas Islam Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p227-250

Keywords:

Substantive Justice, Asset Recovery. Corruption.

Abstract

The problem of returning assets in cases of corruption act still displays the face of procedural justice and is far from substantive justice, because the value of state losses in many cases are not returned in full and the perpetrator is punished with minor crimes. This study uses a normative juridical approach using secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively because it does not use mathematical formulas and numbers. The urgency of returning assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption is based on the reasons for preventing assets from being used to commit other crimes in the future, the reasonableness that morally the perpetrators of the crime do not deserve to control assets illegally acquired, the priority reasons are based on the valuation of assets controlled by the perpetrator. social rights and reasons of ownership that the state has an interest in taking assets controlled by the perpetrator against the law. The progressive legal model for expropriation of asset recovery takes the form of (a) tracing assets and freezing and confiscating assets of the perpetrator regardless of whether or not they are related to the criminal act of corruption. (b) the application of the burden of proof is reversed. (c) the judge imposes a verdict in the form of a penalty of substitute money without being subject to imprisonment, this decision is based on a guarantee for repayment of replacement money for the assets that have been confiscated.

Keywords: Substantive Justice, Asset Recovery. Corruption.

References

Buku

Adrian Sutedi, (2012), Hukum Keuangan negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Alfitra, (2012), Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Beracara Pidana, Perdata, dan Korupsi di Indonesia, Raih Asa Sukses, Bogor.

Ari Wibowo, (2013), Mewujudkan Keadilan Melalui Penerapan Hukum Progreif dalam Membumikan Hukum Progresif, Aswaja, Yogyakarta.

CST Kansil dan Christine Kansil, (2008), Hukum Keuangan dan Perbendaharaan Negara, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Edi Setiadi, (2010), Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Purwaning Yanuar, (2015), Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi, PT Alumni, Bandung.

Siswanto Sunarso, (2015), Viktimologi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, (2006), Pokok-pokok Sosiologi Hukum, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.

Mahrus Ali, (2013), Membumikan Hukum Progresif, Aswaja Presindo, Yogyakarta.

Marwan Mas, (2015), Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Satjipto Rahardjo, (2007), Hukum itu manusia bukan mesin dan Biarkan Hukum Mengalir, Kompas, Jakarta.

Teguh Prasetyo, (2010), Kriminalisasi dalam Hukum Pidana, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Wana Alamsyah, (2019) Laporan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi, ICW, Jakarta.

Jurnal

Ade Mahmud, (2018), Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol 11 No 3.

Anwar, (2010), Problematika Menciptakan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol III No 1 Juni.

Elsa Debora Manurung, Shafira dan Wandyo, (2019), Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Elektronik dan Perilaku Anti Korupsi, Jurnal Veritas et Justitia Vol 5 No 2.

Eddy OS Hiariej, (2013), Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan, Jurnal Opinio Juris, Vol 13 Agustus.

Eddy OS Hiariej, (2019), United Nation Convention Aganst Corruption Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol 31 No 1.

Eko Mukminto dan Awaludin Marwan, (2019), Pluralisme Hukum Progresif : Memberi Ruang Keadilan Bagi yang Liyan, Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol 48 No 1 Januari.

Jamin Ginting, (2011), Perjanjian Internasional dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 3 September.

Nefa Claudia Meliala, (2015), Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif : Upaya Melibatkan Partisipasi Korban dan Pelaku Secara Langsung Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Veritas et Justitia, Vol 1 No 1.

Rahma Noviyanti, Elwi Daniel, Yoserwan, (2019), Penerapan Perma No 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Vol 3 No 1 Maret.

Syamsudin, (2014), Keadilan Prosedural dan Substantif Dalam Putuan Sengketa Tanah Magersari, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol 7 No 1.

________, (2012), Keadilan Substantif yang Terabaikan dalam Sengketa Sita Jaminan, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol V No 1 April.

Qurani Dewi Kusumawardani, (2019) Hukum Progresif dan Perkembangan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan, Jurnal Veritas et Justitia, Vol 5 No 1.