Sufism in Contemporary Scholarship
Mapping the Evolution and Knowledge Production of Sufi Studies through Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jsss.v2i2.56045Keywords:
Sufism; bibliometric analysis; knowledge production; Southern sociologyAbstract
This study maps the evolution and geopolitics of knowledge production in contemporary Sufi studies through a bibliometric analysis of 2,180 Scopus-indexed documents published between 1894 and 2025 across 613 publication sources. Using the Bibliometrix package in R, the analysis examines publication growth, authorship, country distribution, collaboration patterns, and thematic development. The findings indicate an annual publication growth rate of 3.59%, demonstrating sustained scholarly interest in Sufism. Religion and the human remain central themes, while more recent publications increasingly engage with Islamism, politics, modernity, and Muslim identity. Nevertheless, the global visibility of Sufi scholarship remains uneven. Publication and authorship networks are concentrated in Anglophone academic centres, particularly the United Kingdom and the United States, while Pakistan emerges as an important Southern node. This pattern reveals a disparity between the regions in which Sufi traditions are historically embedded and the academic institutions that acquire authority to classify, interpret, and circulate knowledge about them. The dataset also contains engineering publications using SUFI as an acronym, underscoring the need for more rigorous bibliographic curation. From a Southern sociological perspective, this study argues that Sufism should not be treated merely as an empirical object located in the Global South. Southern archives, languages, concepts, institutions, and scholarly communities must also be recognised as sources of sociological theory and epistemic authority. The study contributes to debates on the geopolitics of knowledge in Islamic studies and proposes a more reflexive and regionally grounded agenda for future Sufi scholarship.
References
Alatas, Syed Farid. 2006. Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
Anshori, Muhammad Afif, Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo, and Lailial Muhtifah. 2021. “Contribution of Sufism to the Development of Moderate Islam in Nusantara.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 19(1):40–48. https://doi.org/10.24035/IJIT.19.2021.194.
Aria, Massimo, and Corrado Cuccurullo. 2017. “Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis.” Journal of Informetrics 11(4):959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
Buehler, Arthur F. 2016. Recognizing Sufism: Contemplation in the Islamic Tradition. London, England: I.B. Tauris.
Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. 1st ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117346.
El Taftazani, A. el W. 1992. The Role of Sufism in Modern Society. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Fakultas Ushuluddin, IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Heck, Paul L. 2007. Sufism and Politics: The Power of Spirituality. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers.
Hermansen, Marcia. 2007. “The Academic Study of Sufism at American Universities.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 24(3):24–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v24i3.423.
Howell, Julia Day. 2007. “Sufism and the Modern in Islam.” In Sufism and the ‘Modern’ in Islam, edited by M. van Bruinessen and J. D. Howell. London, England: I.B. Tauris.
Howell, Julia Day. 2008. “Sufisme dan ‘Yang Modern.’” In Urban Sufism, edited by M. van Bruinessen and J. D. Howell. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Press.
Ismail, A. I., and B. Uyuni. 2020. “Ghazali’s Sufism and Its Influence in Indonesia.” Dinika: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 4(1):21–44. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v4i1.1712.
Jafri, S. Z. H., and Helmut Reifeld. 2006. The Islamic Path: Sufism, Society, and Politics in India. New Delhi, India: Rainbow Publishers.
Johns, Anthony H. 1993. “Islamization in Southeast Asia: Reflections and Reconsiderations with Special Reference to the Role of Sufism.” Tonan Ajia Kenkyu 31(1):43–61.
Laffan, Michael F. 2011. The Makings of Indonesian Islam: Orientalism and the Narration of a Sufi Past. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Miichi, Ken. 2019. “Urban Sufi and Politics in Contemporary Indonesia: The Role of Dhikr Associations in the Anti-‘Ahok’ Rallies.” South East Asia Research 27(3):225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2019.1667110.
Mongeon, Philippe, and Adèle Paul-Hus. 2016. “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis.” Scientometrics 106(1):213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
Nimah, Ach Fatori, and Panggih Prabowo R.S. 2025. “The Islamic Educational Values in The Batimung Tradition : Implications for The Young Generation in Banjar District”. Journal of Southern Sociological Studies 1 (1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsss.v1i1.40507.
Passas, Ioannis. 2024. “Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps.” Encyclopedia 4(2).
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. 1st ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876.
van Bruinessen, M. 1994. “Origins and Development of the Sufi Orders (Tarékat) in Southeast Asia.” Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 1(1):1–23.
van Doorslaer, Luc. 2015. “Bibliometric Studies.” Pp. 168–176 in Researching Translation and Interpreting. New York: Routledge.
Wajdi, Firdaus. 2020. “Turkish Sufi Organizations and the Development of Islamic Education in Indonesia.” Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion 5(1):31–49. https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v5i1.907.
Zamhari, Arif. 2013. “Socio-Structural Innovations in Indonesia’s Urban Sufism: The Case Study of the Majelis Dzikir and Shalawat Nurul Mustafa.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 7(1):119–144. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2013.7.1.119-144.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 26
,
PDF Downloads: 21







