Institutional Design for Collaborative Digital Governance in Tlemang Cultural Tourism Village

Authors

  • Deby Febriyan Eprilianto Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Galih Wahyu Pradana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Mashur Hasan Bisri Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Yuyun Eka Kartika Sari Asia E University Malaysia
  • Nabiilah Rohmatan Ilmi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Firgiano Lorenzio Pratama Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jsdg.v3i1.57704

Keywords:

collaborative governance, digital government, institutional design, cultural tourism, village innovation

Abstract

Digital tourism platforms frequently begin as externally supported innovations but struggle to become routine local institutions. This study analyses the institutional design required to sustain EthnoGring, a village-based platform for cultural documentation, tourism communication and local-service integration in Tlemang, Indonesia. A qualitative case study combined document analysis, platform observation and stakeholder material from 21 participants representing government, tourism organizations, university teams, cultural communities and media. The findings identify five institutional gaps: unclear authority, concentrated administrative capacity, incomplete cultural-content rules, project-dependent finance and weak outcome monitoring. The paper proposes a four-layer governance architecture linking policy legitimacy, steering and accountability, content and service operations, and data-based learning. A responsibility matrix assigns accountable, responsible, consulted and informed roles across the Pentahelix actors. The study argues that collaborative digital governance becomes sustainable when a platform is embedded in village rules, recurring budgets, distributed capabilities and an evidence chain that connects digital outputs with verified public value. The proposed design offers an operational model for rural governments seeking to institutionalise community-centered digital innovation.

References

Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x

Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732731

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002

Breaugh, J., Rackwitz, M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2023). Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

Calvi, L., Weber-Sabil, J., Asmar, D., & Socías Pérez, X. (2022). A framework for stakeholders’ involvement in digital productions for cultural heritage tourism. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(7), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6070052

Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004

de Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

Kirklies, P.-C., Neumann, O., & Hohensinn, L. (2024). Promoting digital equality in co-production: The role of platform design. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101903

Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.004

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768

Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

EthnoGring. (2025). EthnoGring—Desa Tlemang Kecamatan Ngimbang. https://ethnogring.com/

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Eprilianto, D. F., Pradana, G. W., Bisri, M. H., Sari, Y. E. K., Ilmi, N. R., & Pratama, F. L. (2026). Institutional Design for Collaborative Digital Governance in Tlemang Cultural Tourism Village. Journal of Social Dynamics and Governance, 3(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsdg.v3i1.57704

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 6 , PDF Downloads: 4