From Hashtags to Health: Evolving Themes in Women’s Digital Activism Across Global Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jsdg.v3i1.56502Keywords:
digital activism, women, digital governance, gender equality (SDG 5), bibliometric analysisAbstract
This study provides an overview of how the field of women’s digital activism has been evolving, through a mixed-method approach combining a systematic literature review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis. While digital platforms have emerged as important venues for women to advocate for their particular concerns, engage in collective mobilization, and contest various social injustices, analyses on the governance response to these phenomena are scarce in the literature. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we have analysed 30 indexed articles in Scopus published from 2011 to 2025. The VOSviewer software was applied for mapping the publishing trend, institution, countries/regions, academic fields, and intellectual clusters in the body of literature. Our findings demonstrate a significant acceleration in publications between 2023 and 2024, representing an expanding and more diversified research landscape in such topics as health activism, feminist perspectives to gender-based violence, and transnational networks in the Middle East and North Africa region. Yet, we also find a concentration of the literature within Western academia and Social Sciences scholarship, with insufficient research on the governance of digital platforms, state regulation, and the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular, SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions).
References
Acevedo, M. L. (2023). Digital activism of women with disabilities on Instagram: Analysis of three cases in Chile. Cuadernos.Info, 54, 225–246. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.54.51207
Alam, N. (2024). The impact of social media on women's rights movements: Empowerment, challenges and future directions. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 3(8), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-08-001
Clark, R. (2016). “Hope in a hashtag”: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235
Esquivel, V., & Sweetman, C. (2016). Gender and the Sustainable Development Goals. Gender & Development, 24(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1153318
Fotopoulou, A. (2016). Feminist activism and digital networks. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50471-5
Gajjala, R., Edwards, E. L., Rahut, D., Faniyi, O. M., Jha, B., Jain, J., Khan, A., & Farooq, S. (2023). Transnationalising Dadis as feminist political/activist subjects. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 7(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/12886
Liu, H. Y. (2023). Tech worker activism against gender discrimination in China. Capital and Class, 47(4), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231184700
Mano, R. (2023). Social media and civic participation: A gendered approach. Advances in Applied Sociology, 13(8), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2023.138037
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190697846.001.0001
Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Peña-Fernández, S., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2023). Feminism, gender identity and polarization in TikTok and Twitter. Comunicar, 31(75), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.3916/C75-2023-04
Sarakavik, N. (2023). Subjectivity, power, and women's political activism in the Belarusian digital society. Topos, 2023(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.61095/1815-0047-2023-2-139-152
Suzor, N., Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Gillett, R., Burgess, J., & Van Geelen, T. (2019). Human rights by design: The responsibilities of social media platforms to address gender-based violence online. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.185
Turrini, M. (2023). “There are many of us”: Online testimonies from “pill victims” as a new form of health activism. Qualitative Health Research, 33(7), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231163741
UN Women. (2025, November). Digital violence is intensifying, yet nearly half of the world’s women and girls lack legal protection from digital abuse. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/press-release/2025/11/digital-violence-is-intensifying-yet-nearly-half-of-the-worlds-women-and-girls-lack-legal-protection-from-digital-abuse
Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014
Zhao, X., & Abidin, C. (2023). The “fox eye” challenge trend: Anti-racism work, platform affordances, and the vernacular of gesticular activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157590
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frederik Masri Gasa, Rachmah Ida, Irfan Wahyudi, Yongkie Angkawijaya, Norfarizah Mohd Bakhir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 23
,
PDF Downloads: 10
