Daily Energy Generation Characteristics of Solar Photovoltaic Systems: A Scenario-Based Intraday Simulation

Authors

  • L. Endah Cahya Ningrum Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Arya Seno Fahri Lukito Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Maulana Arya Wardana Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

photovoltaics, daily energy yield, intraday variability, synthetic irradiance, ramp rate, cloud scenarios

Abstract

Daily photovoltaic (PV) energy yield is governed not only by the accumulated solar resource but also by its distribution within daylight hours. This study introduces four fully synthetic, reproducible daily sky scenarios to isolate the effects of temporal shape on PV power, energy yield, and short-term ramps. A normalized daylight envelope is multiplied by transparent cloud-transmittance functions at 15-min resolution and converted to output using a 1-kWp reference PV array with a constant 0.78 system performance factor. For clear-sky, partly cloudy, overcast, and intermittent-cloud conditions, calculated daily energy yields are clear sky 5.19 kWh, partly cloudy 4.21 kWh, overcast 2.38 kWh, intermittent clouds 3.81 kWh. The scenario ranking demonstrates that mean attenuation primarily controls daily energy, whereas rapidly changing attenuation governs operational ramps. Temporal aggregation substantially suppresses estimated short-term ramps, emphasizing the dependence of variability conclusions on sampling resolution. All outputs are illustrative simulations without field measurements, calibrated meteorological data, or claims about a specific city. The proposed metrics offer a transparent benchmark for teaching, scenario comparison and the design of future field-based investigations.

References

[1] van Haaren, R., Morjaria, M., and Fthenakis, V., “Empirical assessment of short-term variability from utility-scale solar PV plants,” Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 22, pp. 548–559, 2014. doi:10.1002/pip.2302.

[2] Lauret, P., Perez, R., Mazorra Aguiar, L., Tapachès, E., Diagne, H. M., and David, M., “Characterization of the intraday variability regime of solar irradiation of climatically distinct locations,” Solar Energy, vol. 125, pp. 99–110, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.032.

[3] Lonij, V. P. A., Brooks, A. E., Cronin, A. D., Leuthold, M., and Koch, K., “Intra-hour forecasts of solar power production using measurements from a network of irradiance sensors,” Solar Energy, vol. 97, pp. 58–66, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.002.

[4] Rodríguez-Benítez, F. J., Arbizu-Barrena, C., Santos-Alamillos, F. J., Tovar-Pescador, J., and Pozo-Vázquez, D., “Analysis of the intra-day solar resource variability in the Iberian Peninsula,” Solar Energy, vol. 171, pp. 374–387, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.060.

[5] Elsinga, B. and van Sark, W. G. J. H. M., “Analytic model for correlations of cloud induced fluctuations of clear-sky index,” Solar Energy, vol. 155, pp. 985–1001, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.035.

[6] Lappalainen, K. and Valkealahti, S., “Output power variation of different PV array configurations during irradiance transitions caused by moving clouds,” Applied Energy, vol. 190, pp. 902–910, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.013.

[7] Zamora Zapata, M. and Kleissl, J., “Dependence of subhourly solar variability statistics on time interval and cloud vertical position,” 2022. doi:10.1063/5.0090846.

[8] Al-Hilfi, H. A. H., Abu-Siada, A., and Shahnia, F., “Estimating generated power of photovoltaic systems during cloudy days using gene expression programming,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 185–194, 2021. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3029217.

[9] “Simulation-Based Approach to Assessing Short-Term Power Variations of PV Power Plants Under Cloud Conditions,” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1837–1848, 2024. doi:10.35833/MPCE.2024.000460.

[10] “Classification of Daily Irradiance Profiles and the Behaviour of Photovoltaic Plant Elements: The Effects of Cloud Enhancement,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 11, article 5230, 2021. doi:10.3390/app11115230.

[11] “A Standardized Sky Condition Classification Method for Multiple Timescales and Its Applications in the Solar Industry,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 18, article 4616, 2024. doi:10.3390/en17184616.

[12] Mol et al., “Reconciling Observations of Solar Irradiance Variability With Cloud Size Distributions,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2023. doi:10.1029/2022JD037894.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27
Abstract views: 13 , PDF Downloads: 12