ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 84/PUU-XXII/2024 TENTANG PERPANJANGAN JABATAN NOTARIS
Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision; Legal Consequences; Notary; Retirement Age; Transitional NormAbstract
The Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024 amended the retirement age limit for notaries, creating legal issues regarding its implementation, particularly for notaries who had reached retirement age before the decision was pronounced. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court in granting the petition and to examine the legal consequences of the decision for retired notaries. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources analyzed through qualitative and prescriptive methods. The findings reveal that the Constitutional Court based its decision on constitutional protection, developments in professional practice, and objective considerations regarding the capacity of notaries to continue performing their duties. However, although the mechanism for extending a notary's term of office has subsequently been regulated, the decision applies prospectively and does not affect notaries whose terms had expired before the judgment was delivered. Consequently, retired notaries remain ineligible for term extension, giving rise to legal issues concerning the transitional implementation of the new norm and highlighting the need for greater legal certainty in its application.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2020). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Alfarijah, D. A., Muda, I., & Santosa, I. (2023). Constitutionality of freedom of association of notary organization in Indonesia. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(4), 179–189.
Buana, M. S. (2020). Legal-political paradigm of Indonesian Constitutional Court. Constitutional Review, 6(2), 243–267.
Dicky Eko Prasetio, Muh. Ali Masnun, Arinto Nugroho, Denial Ikram, N. (2024). Discrimination Related to Labour Age Limitation in Indonesia : A Human Rights and Comparative Law Perspective. Suara Hukum, 6(2), 228–254.
Mahadewi, I. G. A. I., Padmawati, N. K. T., & Jayantiari, I. G. A. M. R. (2022). Notary in Indonesia: How are state fundamental values reflected in law and professional ethics? Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 6(2), 204–219.
Budiono, A., Sugiarto, D. P. A., & Zuhdi, S. (2023). Legal protection for notaries in making authentic deeds in Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review.
Cahyaningrum, T. D., Aprilianda, N., & Susilo, H. (2025). Legal implications of Article 66 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries in the Summoning of Notaries by Investigators. International Indonesian Journal of Social and Education.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2025 tentang Tata Cara Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024.
Prasetio, D. E., Masnun, M. A., & Noviyanti, N. (2025). Post-Election Reconciliation in 2024 as a Constitutional Convention in Indonesia: A Progressive Legal Culture Perspective. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.26999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Han Satria Pratama, Mahendra Wardhana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 177
,
PDF Downloads: 0
