A systematic Literature Review: Technology Digital and ESG
Keywords:
ESG; Performance SDGs; Technology digitalAbstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study aims to analyze the relationship between digital technology and ESG performance using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method from previous studies in the last decade. Background Problems: This convergence of technological innovation, ESG performance, and responsive policies creates a new business paradigm. However, understanding the impact of digital technology on ESG performance remains limited. Novelty: this article is to explore the relationship between digital technologies and ESG, thereby providing a state-of-the-art research overview on the topic. Research Methods: This research adopted the systematic literature review (SLR) methodology to examine the influence of digital technology on ESG performance in the last 10 years (2015-2025) from leading international databases. The SLR process involved three main stages: planning the review, applying screening criteria, and analyzing the review. Finding/Results: Over the past decade, research on digital technology and ESG has shown a positive impact on performance, particularly in the face of global challenges like COVID-19. Technologies like Industry 5.0, green innovation, and digital inclusive finance strengthen ESG reporting. The Stakeholder Theory is widely used, emphasizing stakeholder interests in sustainable decision-making. Conclusion: Future studies on how digital technology affects ESG performance ought to incorporate viewpoints from a variety of stakeholders, such as investors, customers, and legislators. The AIESG Protocol can encourage transparency, and dual materiality can improve ESG performance. Investment in digital infrastructure and qualitative methods must be combined for post-pandemic adaption.
References
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
Arunkumar, O. N., Divya, D., & Chandan. (2025). ESG efficiency analysis in the IT industry: a DEA-based approach. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2450092
Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937
Baratta, A., Cardamone, M., Greco, O., Longo, F., Nicoletti, L., Padovano, A., Sammarco, C., & Solina, V. (2025). Assessing the ESG Impacts of Italy’s Transition to Industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 3268–3275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.051
Basavaraj, C. D., & Prakash, S. K. J. (2024). What Drives Social Accounting Research? Insights From a Bibliometric Analysis. Environmental Quality Management, 34(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22317
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38(August 2020), 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Broccardo, L., Culasso, F., Dhir, A., & Truant, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility: Does it really matter in the luxury context? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2341
Chen, D., & Wang, S. (2024). Digital transformation, innovation capabilities, and servitization as drivers of ESG performance in manufacturing SMEs. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76416-8
Chen, W., Xie, Y., & He, K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance and corporate innovation novelty. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.01.003
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
Chu, H., Niu, X., Li, M., & Wei, L. (2025). Research on the impact of new quality productivity on enterprise ESG performance. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99(January), 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104009
Coates, J. (2021). ESG Disclosure – Keeping Pace with Developments Affecting Investors , Public Companies and the Capital Markets. US SEC Public Statements, 3–5. https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/coates-esg-disclosure-keeping-pace-031121?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
Ding, D. K., Ferreira, C., & Wongchoti, U. (2018). Reading between the lines: not all CSR is good CSR. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-07-2017-0048
Handoyo, S., & Anas, S. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on firm performance: the moderating role of country regulatory quality and government effectiveness in ASEAN. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371071
He, X., & Chen, W. (2024). Digital Transformation and Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance from a Human Capital Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114737
Koundouri, P., Pittis, N., & Plataniotis, A. (2022). The Impact of ESG Performance on the Financial Performance of European Area Companies: An Empirical Examination. October 2014, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015013
Li, S., Xing, K., Meng, J., & Yang, X. (2025). How does the innovation of digital and green technology integration promote corporate environmental performance. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99(December 2024), 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104035
Li, W., & Pang, W. (2023). The impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance: based on the perspective of corporate green technology innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(24), 65314–65327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27057-3
Ma, Y., Liu, P., & Chen, H. (2024). Corporate ESG Performance, Green Innovation, and Green New Quality Productivity: Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229804
Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Shaping ESG commitment through organizational psychological capital: The role of CEO power. Business Strategy and the Environment, October 2024, 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4007
Marie, M., Qi, B., Gerged, A. M., & Nobanee, H. (2024). Exploring Environmental, Social and Governance research in the wake of COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis of current trends and recommendations for future research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, June, 6131–6149. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2909
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Niu, S. J., Park, B. Il, & Jung, J. S. (2022). The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15639). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142315639
Nyantakyi, G., Atta Sarpong, F., Adu Sarfo, P., Uchenwoke Ogochukwu, N., & Coleman, W. (2023). A boost for performance or a sense of corporate social responsibility? A bibliometric analysis on sustainability reporting and firm performance research (2000-2022). Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2220513
Park, H. S., & Ahn, Y. G. (2025). A study on the correlation analysis between digitalization and Korean maritime listed firm performance. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2024.2435194
Pulino, S. C., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595
Putri, L. J., Andrianto, F., & Hamidi, M. (2025). Analysis of ESG Disclosure in ASEAN Countries : The Influence of Board CSR Orientation , Board CSR Strategy , GRI and National Cultural Demensions. 6(3), 1551–1564.
Ruan, L., Yang, L., & Dong, K. (2024). Corporate green innovation: The influence of ESG information disclosure. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100628
Sætra, H. S. (2023). The AI ESG protocol: Evaluating and disclosing the environment, social, and governance implications of artificial intelligence capabilities, assets, and activities. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2438
Sarpong, F. A., Sappor, P., Nyantakyi, G., Ahakwa, I., Esther Agyeiwaa, O., & Blandful Cobbinah, B. (2023). From traditional roots to digital bytes: Can digitalizing ESG improves Ghanaian rural banks’ brand equity through stakeholder engagement, and customer loyalty? Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2232159
Shi, Y., Chin, T., Rowley, C., & Wang, S. (2025). Towards ecosystem-oriented business models in the Asia Pacific: dialectical dynamics of digital technologies, nature, and human wellbeing. Asia Pacific Business Review, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2053390
Singh, S., Holvoet, N., & Pandey, V. (2018). Bridging sustainability and corporate social responsibility: Culture of monitoring and evaluation of CSR initiatives in India. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072353
Siswanti, I., Riyadh, H. A., Nawangsari, L. C., Mohd Yusoff, Y., & Wibowo, M. W. (2024). The impact of digital transformation for sustainable business: the meditating role of corporate governance and financial performance. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2316954
Soori, M., Jough, F. K. G., Dastres, R., & Arezoo, B. (2024). Blockchains for industrial Internet of Things in sustainable supply chain management of industry 4.0, a review. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 3(June), 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2024.100026
Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E., & Sahore, N. (2024). Environmental, social and governance issues in supply chains. A systematic review for strategic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434(November 2023), 140024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140024
Wang, Lang, & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48636-x
Wang, Li, & Yang, H. (2024). Digital technology innovation and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China. In Economic Change and Restructuring (Vol. 57, Issue 6). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09791-x
Wang, Y., & Wang, D. D. (2025). The Dual Path of the Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on ESG Performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062341
Wu, X., Li, L., Liu, D., & Li, Q. (2024). Technology empowerment: Digital transformation and enterprise ESG performance-Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. PLoS ONE, 19(4 April), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302029
Xie, X., Zhu, H., & Zhao, J. (2024). How effective is digital transformation? Heterogeneous insights from listed companies’ ESG performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1534). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04039-5
Xu, C., & He, Y. (2025). The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Technology Innovation: A Moderating Effect Based on Digital Transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073170
Yadav, S., Samadhiya, A., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., & Pandey, K. K. (2024). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting and Missing (M) Scores in the Industry 5.0 Era: Broadening Firms’ and Investors’ Decisions to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, M, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3306
Yadav, U. S., Ghosal, I., Pareek, A., Khandelwal, K., yadav, A. K., & Chakraborty, C. (2024). Impact of entrepreneurial orientation and ESG on environmental performance: moderating impact of digital transformation and technological innovation as a mediating construct using Sobel test. In Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Vol. 13, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00443-y
Yin, N. (2025). Will Digital Transformation Empower Corporate ESG Performance: Moderated Mediation Analysis through the Prism of Executives’ Foreign Experience. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 34(4), 3893–3907. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/189714
Yong, C. K., Alfan, E., & Mustapha, M. Z. (2024). Sustainability Committee and Environmental, Social and Governance (Esg): a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(2), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7603.2024
Yu, Z., Farooq, U., Alam, M. M., & Dai, J. (2024). How does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance determine investment mix? New empirical evidence from BRICS. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(3), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.02.007
Zhang, M., & Huang, Z. (2024). The Impact of Digital Transformation on ESG Performance: The Role of Supply Chain Resilience. Sustainability, 16(17), 7621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177621
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmi Syafitri, Noorlailie Soewarno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 19
,
PDF Downloads: 4
