The Strategic Role of Innovation as a Mediator Between Internal Firm Factors and Value Creation:

A Study of the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry

Authors

  • Prihat Assih Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Diyah Sukanti Cahyaningsih Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Kanitsorn Terdpaopong Accounting Study Program, Rangsit University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v17n2.p244-260

Keywords:

Firm value, Innovation, Managerial Ownership, Profitability, Size

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study analyzes the role of innovation in bridging factors that influence firm value. As is known, COVID-19 has triggered manufacturing companies to innovate both processes and products. Methods: This study places the innovation variable as an intervening variable to examine whether companies with adequate profitability, assets, managerial ownership, and determinants of R&D activities can drive firm value. The sample in this study was 132 manufacturing companies with an observation period of 2021-2024. Finding/Results: The results of this study show that the role of managerial ownership influences corporate innovation. Firm size hurts innovation, and the ability to generate profits in period t-1 can drive innovation in period t. Firm value is proven to be influenced by managerial ownership, size, profitability, and innovation. Innovation can also act as an intervening variable. Conclusions: This study contributes a discourse that the role of innovation in manufacturing companies is quite significant. Government encouragement can increase R&D activities. Thus, manufacturing companies should consider R&D activities, which are a positive signal for investors.

References

Aaslaid, K. (2018). 50 Examples of Corporations That Failed to Innovate. Valuer+, 108. https://valuer.ai/blog/50-examples-of-corporations-that-failed-to-innovate-and-missed-their-chance/

Al‐Najjar, B. (2010). Corporate governance and institutional ownership: evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011035693

Ambashi, M. (2018). Innovation Policy in ASEAN.

Amin, S., & Shoaib, A. (2017). Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Firm Performance of Pharmaceuticals: A Study of the London Stock Exchange. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 16(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649217500174

Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Firm Profitability, Growth, and Innovation. Review of Industrial Organization, 10(5), 579–588. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41798600

Bardhan, I., Viswanathan Krishnan, & Lin, S. (2013). Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0481

Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.5465/256308

Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of Innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014453.94445.de

Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120702

Chen, C. R., Guo, W., & Mande, V. (2003). Managerial ownership and firm valuation: Evidence from Japanese firms. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-538X(03)00024-6

Chen, C. R., & Steiner, T. L. (2000). Tobin’s Q, managerial ownership, and analyst coverage: A nonlinear simultaneous equations model. Journal of Economics and Business, 52(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(00)00024-2

Chen, V. Z., Li, J., Shapiro, D. M., & Zhang, X. (2014). Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9357-5

Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. (2011). Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.004

Connolly, R. A., & Hirschey, M. (2005). Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin’s q. R and D Management, 35(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00384.x

Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304

Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 128/PMK.010/2019, (2019).

Dobrzanski, P., & Bobowski, S. (2020). The efficiency of r&d expenditures in ASEAN countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072686

Fernández, M. G., & Velasco, C. G. (2018). Innovation and corporate performance in the Spanish regions. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(5), 998–1021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.05.005

Hirdinis, M. (2019). Capital structure and firm size on firm value moderated by profitability. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(1), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/204

Iswajuni, I., Manasikana, A., & Soegeng Soetedjo. (2018). The effect of enterprise risk management ( ERM ) on firm value in manufacturing companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange year 2010-2013. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0006

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jiang, L. (Alice), Waller, D. S., & Cai, S. (2013). Does ownership type matter for innovation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2473–2478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.037

Kamasak, R. (2015). Determinants of innovation Performance: A Resource-based Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1330–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.311

La Rosa, F., & Liberatore, G. (2014). Biopharmaceutical and chemical firms’ R&D disclosure, and cost of equity: The impact of the regulatory regime. European Management Journal, 32(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.003

Li, M., Chen, X., & Zhang, G. (2017). How does firm size affect technology licensing? Empirical evidence from China. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1249–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2451-6

Mai, M. U. (2017). Mediation of CSR and Profitability on the Influences of GCG Mechanisms To the Firm Value. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 21(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v21i2.393

McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C

Medlen, C. (2003). Veblen’s Q: Tobin’s Q. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(4), 967–986. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227960

Musa, A., & Adamu, J. (2018). Determinants of firms innovation in Nigeria. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.07.006

Nekhili, M., Hussainey, K., Cheffi, W., Chtioui, T., & Tchakoute-Tchuigoua, H. (2016). R&D Narrative Disclosure, Corporate Governance And Market Value: Evidence From France. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i1.9527

Osazuwa, N. P., & Ahmad, A. C. (2016). The moderating effect of profitability and leverage on the relationship between eco-efficiency and firm value in publicly traded Malaysian firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2015-0034

Pardue, J. H., Higgins, E., & Biggart, T. (2000). The Impact of New Product Annauncements on Firm Value in Information Technology Producing Industries : An Examination Of Industry - Level Evolutionary Eras. The Enginering Economist, 45(2), 144–157.

Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2004). New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 142–156. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162022

Rodríguez, J. V. P., & Valcarcel, B. G. L. (2012). Do product innovation and news about the R&D process produce large price changes and overreaction? The case of pharmaceutical stock prices. Applied Economics, 44(17), 2217–2229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.562172

Rong, Z., & Xiao, S. (2017). Innovation-Related Diversification and Firm Value. European Financial Management, 23(3), 475–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12110

Saad, N. M., Haniff, M. N., & Ali, N. (2016). Firm’s Growth and Sustainability: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating the Default Risks of Sukuk and Conventional Bonds. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 339–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00042-3

Sakaki, H., & Jory, S. R. (2019). Institutional investors’ ownership stability and firms’ innovation. Journal of Business Research, 103, 10–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.032

Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097–1125. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809230

Setiadharma, S., & Machali, M. (2017). The Effect of Asset Structure and Firm Size on Firm Value with Capital Structure as Intervening Variable. Journal of Business and Finance Affairs, 6(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000298

Shin, J., & Shin, H. (2013). Institutional ownership and technological relatedness: A test of endogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2279–2286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.041

Song, J., Wei, Y. (Susan), & Wang, R. (2015). Market orientation and innovation performance: The moderating roles of firm ownership structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.03.005

Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280. https://doi.org/10.1086/261970

Tonkiss, F. (2009). Trust, confidence and economic crisis. Intereconomics, 44(4), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-009-0295-x

Umrie, H. R. H., & Yuliani, Y. (2015). Ownership structure, innovation to firm value with the financing decision as mediation. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy | Ventura, 17(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v17i2.307

Waluyo, D. (2024). Investasi di Sektor Manufaktur Terus Naik. Porta Informasi Indonesia. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/7989/investasi-di-sektor-manufaktur-terus-naik?lang=1

Yi, J., Hong, J., Hsu, W. chung, & Wang, C. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 62–63, 4–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.002

Zeng, T., & Lin, H. C. (2011). Ownership structure and R&D spending: Evidence from China’s listed firms. Chinese Management Studies, 5(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506141111118471

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Assih, P., Cahyaningsih, D. S., & Terdpaopong, K. (2026). The Strategic Role of Innovation as a Mediator Between Internal Firm Factors and Value Creation: : A Study of the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v17n2.p244-260
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0