Participatory Budgeting in Indonesia: from the Policy Innovation to the Democracy Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v6n2.p527-565Keywords:
participatory budgeting, democratic innovation, prodamasAbstract
Community participation in the government budgeting process provides opportunities for wider and deeper public participation. This paper uses a systematic literature review method with a meta-synthetic approach that aims to examine the practice of participatory budgeting (PB) in Indonesia by comparing PB programs in the early reform era with PB programs in the reform era. The results show that the PB model in the early era of World Bank-sponsored reforms such as the Musrenbang (PNPM and KDP) is a technocratic administrative policy innovation because it has standard rules, innovation comes from the government and the community becomes the object of government policy. In addition, this study also finds that Prodamas indirectly strengthens Musrenbang because of its participation at the RT level. People at the lowest level are encouraged to participate more. Therefore, the researcher hopes that Regional Regulations have greater power.
References
Abers, R., Brandão, I., King, R., & Votto, D. (2018). Porto Alegre: Participatory Budgeting and the Challenge of Sustaining Transformative Change. World Resources Report Case Studies, 1–25.
Almén, O. (2016). Local participatory innovations and experts as political entrepreneurs: The case of China’s democracy consultants. Democratization, 23(3), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.982107
Ambarwati, I. D. (2019). Perencanaan Yang Tak Partisipatif: Proses Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) Kecamatan Randudongkal Kabupaten Pemalang Tahun 2019. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 8(4), 271–280. ttps://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/25056
Amin, F. (2020). Pendekatan Bottom Up Budgeting dalam Penganggaran Pemerintah (Studi tentang Penganggaran Partisipatif di Komunitas Nelayan Miskin di Kawasan Pantai Prigi Kabupaten Trenggalek). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Publik Dan Kebijakan Sosial, 4(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.25139/jmnegara.v4i2.2868
Andhika, L. R., Nurasa, H., Karlina, N., & Candradewini, C. (2019). Inovasi Partisipasi Penganggaran Daerah Melalui Model Platform Media Sosial. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i2.387
Andri, I. (2019). Model Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Kampung Siaga Aktif di Kampung Salor Indah Distrik Kurik Kabupaten Merauke. Sospol, 5(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v5i1.6990
Apriyani, K. D., & Irhamna. (2016). Respon Publik terhadap Model Penganggaran Partisipatif dalam Pembangunan Desa: Studi Tiga Provinsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v13i2.576
Asmoro, W. K., & Setianingsih, N. A. (2019). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana “Prodamas” dalam Mewujudkan Good Government Governance di Tingkat Kelurahan Pemerintahan Kota Kediri. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v3i2.171
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. E. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics and Society, 42(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978
Beard, V. A., Mahendra, A., & Westphal, M. I. (2016). Towards a More Equal City: Framing the Challenges and Opportunities. World Resources Report.
Beritajatim. (2022). Prodamas Plus, Program Plus Plus Bagi Warga Kota Kediri. https://beritajatim.com/politik-pemerintahan/prodamas-plus-program-plus-plus-bagi-warga-kota-kediri/
Chongwhan, K. (2015). The Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting: a Case Study of Jeju, South Korea. Submitted in part-fulfilment of the Degree of Masters of Public Administration The University of Nottingham Kim.
Christensen, H. S. (2019). How citizens evaluate participatory processes: A conjoint analysis. European Political Science Review, Democratic. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5t72a
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (IV; A. Faw). Pustaka Pelajar.
Davidson, M. (2018). Participatory Budgeting, Austerity and Institutions of Democracy. City, 22(4), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1507107
Dean, R., Boswell, J., & Smith, G. (2020). Designing Democratic Innovations as Deliberative Systems: The Ambitious Case of NHS Citizen. Political Studies, 68(3), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719866002
Denzon, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Escobar, O. (2017). Pluralism and Democratic Participation: What Kind of Citizen are Citizens Invited to be? Contemporary Pragmatism, 14(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-01404002
Escobar, O., & Elstub, S. (2019). Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance: the field of democratic innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862
Fadri, Z. (2020). Pembangunan Masyarakat Alternatif Model Democratic Participatory. Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 4(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v4i2.2437
Faedlulloh, D. (2019). The Failure of the Labor Movement And Labor Party in the Reform Era General Election. Politica, 10(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v10i1.1448
Fahmi, F. Z., McCann, P., & Koster, S. (2017). Creative economy policy in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Urban Studies, 54(6), 1367–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620529
Farhan, A. (2017). Strategi Pemerintah Kota Kediri Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Melaui Prodamas (Studi Penelitian di Kantor Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan di Desa Tamanan RT 01 RW 03). Qawãnïn: Journal of Economic Syaria Law, 1(2), 38–67. https://doi.org/10.30762/q.v1i2.512
Feruglio, F., & Rifai, A. (2017). Participatory Budgeting in Indonesia: Past, Present and Future. In Making All Voices Count (Issue January).
Fitrah, N. (2017). Problematika Pelaksanaan Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Desa (Musrenbang Desa) Studi Kasus Desa Rumpa Kecamatan Mapilli. MITZAL (Demokrasi, Komunikasi Dan Budaya) : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.35329/mitzal.v2i2.273
Franco, S. H. R., & Assis, W. F. T. (2019). Participatory Budgeting and Transformative Development in Brazil. Geoforum, 103, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.025
Grillos, T. (2017). Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia. World Development, 96, 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.019
Haliim, W. (2019). Program Dana Hibah Dalam Perspektif Politik Distributif: Studi Kasus Prodamas Kota Kediri. Paradigma Polistaat: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v2i1.1358
Haussy, M. (2021). Case Study: Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. Updating Democracy // Rebooting the State. https://medium.com/updating-democracy-rebooting-the-state/case-study-participatory-budgeting-in-brazil-9b7c48290c29
Hendriks, F. (2019). Democratic innovation beyond deliberative reflection: the plebiscitary rebound and the advent of action-oriented democracy. Democratization, 26(3), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1547896
Hertanto, Y., Domai, T., & Amin, F. (2017). Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) Keuangan Terhadap Efektivitas Pelaporan Keuangan (Studi pada Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Aset Daerah di Kabupaten Blitar). PUBLISIA (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 1(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v2i1.1424
Imtihan, H., Wahyunadi, & Firmansyah, M. (2017). Peran Pemerintah Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Musrenbang Ds. Taman Sari Kecamatan Gunungsari Kabupaten Lombok Barat 2016). Neo Bis, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21107/nbs.v1i1.2952
Jaske, M. (2018). Democratic Innovations in Finnish Local Politics: Essays on the Varieties, Causes and Consequensces of Mechanisms for Direct Participation. Dissertation: University of Turku.
Jayasinghe, K., Adhikari, P., Carmel, S., & Sopanah, A. (2020). Multiple rationalities of participatory budgeting in indigenous communities: evidence from Indonesia. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 2139–2166. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3486
Jung, S.-M. (2021). Participatory budgeting and government efficiency: evidence from municipal governments in South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852321991208
Kediri.jatimtimes.com. (2019). Wakil Wali Kota Kediri : Program Prioritas yang Tidak Bisa Direalisasikan dalam Musrenbang Dapat Dicover Melalui Prodamas. https://kediri.jatimtimes.com/baca/189173/20190305/194300/wakil-wali-kota-kediri-program-prioritas-yang-tidak-bisa-direalisasikan-dalam-musrenbang-dapat-dicover-melalui-prodamas
Kim, S. (2016). Participatory Governance and Policy Diffusion in Local Governments in Korea: Implementation of Participatory Budgeting. In KDI Research Monograph (No. 2016-01). https://doi.org/10.22740/kdi.rm.e.2016.01
KPU Kediri Kota. (2018). Pilwali Kota Kediri 2018.
Krenjova, J., & Raudla, R. (2018). Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416688961
Kuruppu, C., Adhikari, P., Gunarathne, V., Karunarathne, D., Perera, P., & Karunarathne, C. (2016). Participatory budgeting in a Sri Lankan urban council: A practice of power and domination. Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 41, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.01.002
Lee, S. (2014). The Impact of the Korean Preliminary Feasibility Study on Budgetary Decisions. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Birmingham.
Maulana, D. (2018). Budget Policy Innovation Through Participatory Budgeting In The Provincial Government Of Banten. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi (JIA) Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v15i1.139
Miller, S. A., Hilderth, R. W., & Stewart, L. M. (2019). The Modes of Participation: A Revised Frame for Identifying and Analyzing Participatory Budgeting Practices. Administration & Society, 51(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717718325
Murbeng, S. B., Soeaidy, M. S., & Riyanto. (2017). Pelaksanaan Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri Perdesaan (PNPM MP) (Studi pada Desa Bendungan Kecamatan Gondang Kabupaten Tulungagung). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 1(6), 1257–1265.
Natalia, C. (2018). Ikhtisar: Global State of Democracy: Mengkaji Ketahanan Demokrasi. In Ikhtisar: Global State of Democracy: Mengkaji Ketahanan Demokrasi. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2018.55
No, W., & Hsueh, L. (2020). How a participatory process with inclusive structural design allocates resources toward poor neighborhoods: the case of participatory budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320943668
Pemerintah Kota Kediri. (2015). Walikota Kediri Luncurkan Prodamas. https://www.kedirikota.go.id/p/berita/1016711/walikota-kediri-luncurkan-prodamas
Pemerintah Kota Kediri. (2016). Wakil Wali Kota Kediri: Musrenbang dan Prodamas Harus Bersinergi. https://www.kedirikota.go.id/p/dalamberita/664/wakil-wali-kota-kediri:-musrenbang-dan-prodamas-harus-bersinergi
Pilet, J. B., Bol, D., Vittori, D., & Paulis, E. (2022). Public support for deliberative citizens’ assemblies selected through sortition: Evidence from 15 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12541
Pivaldi, R. K. (2016). Peran Kepala Desa Untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Di Desa Saba’u Kecamatan Samalantan Kabupaten Bengkayang. Governance: Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26418%2F%25governance.v4i4.845
Primastuti, S. K. (2018). Evaluating Development Planning Deliberation (the Musrenbang) as a Participatory Budgeting Practice in Indonesia: A Case of Batu City Government, East Java Province. Thesis Program Magister, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya.
Pusat Kajian Anggaran Badan Keahlian DPR RI. (2016). Penganggaran Partisipatif dan Pemberdayaan Partisipasi Masyarakat. In Buletin APBN (20th ed.). Badan Keahlian DPR RI. www.puskajianggaran.dpr.go.id
Rahmawati, F., & Khoirunurrofik. (2021). Planning Consistency and the Political Budget Cycle in Indonesia: Simultaneous Regional Elections in 2017 and 2018. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan, 14(2), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.24843/JEKT.2021.v14.i02.p06
Rahmawati, S. M., & Supriatono, B. (2019). Implementasi Penganggaran Partisipatif di Indonesia. Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan), 4(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v4i1.150
Ridlowi, R., & Himam, F. (2018). Inovasi pada Organisasi Pemerintah: Tahapan dan Dinamika. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.31866
Ríos, A.-M., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2017). Factors Explaining Public Participation in the Central Government Budget Process. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12197
Risnawan, W. (2018). Pengentasan Kemiskinan Melalui PNPM Mandiri Pedesaan (Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Ciamis Kabupaten Ciamis). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 5(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.25157/dinamika.v5i2.1411
Satriani, I., Setiawati, B., & Muhiddin, A. (2022). Participatory Budgeting Di Desa Lamanda Kecamatan Bontotiro Kabupaten Bulukumba. KIMAP: Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik, 3(2), 575–584.
Setianingsih, N. A. (2018). Penganggaran Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Prodamas) Kota Kediri. Jurnal RAK (Riset Akuntansi Keuangan), 3(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.31002/rak.v3i1.601
Silvia, R., & Lutfi, A. (2022). Participatory Budgeting: Lessons for Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.902
Simangunsong, F. (2021). Isi Orasi Ilmiah Guru Besar Fernandes Simangunsong 2020-2021. November 2020. www.fernandessimangunsong.com
Simangunsong, F., & Hutasoit, I. (2018). Implementing Roadmap Model Ahead Indonesian Bureaucratic Reform Through Quick Wins Method. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 1–15.
Sinaga, A. M. M. (2022). Menilai Proses Penganggaran Partisipatif di Pemerintah Daerah Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Pembangunan, 4(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.36087/jrp.v4i2.98
Siswanto. (2010). Systematic Review Sebagai Metode Penelitian Untuk Mensintasis Hasil-Hasil Penelitian (Sebuah Pengantar). Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.22435/bpsk.v13i4 Okt.2766
Smith, G. (2011). Democratic Innovations: Bringing Theory and Practice Into Dialogue. Philosophy Compass, 6(12), 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00448.x
Soedjono, E. S., Fitriani, N., Rahman, R., & Made Wahyu Wijaya, I. (2018). Achieving Water Sensitive City Concept Through Musrenbang Mechanism in Surabaya City, Indonesia. International Journal of GEOMATE, 15(49), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.21660/2018.49.3649
Sopanah. (2008). Model Pengembangan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Penyusunan APBD. Jurnal Akuntasi Dan Keuangan, 7(1), 50–67.
Sopanah, A. (2012). Ceremonial Budgeting: Public Participation in Development Planning at an Indonesian Local Government Authority. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(2), 73–84.
Sururi, A. (2017). Inovasi Kebijakan dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik Menuju Terwujudnya Good Public Policy Governance. Spirit Publik, 12(2), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/6djph
Susanto, M. (2019). Model Alternatif Pendanaan Partai Politik. Jurnal Kajian, 22(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.22212/kajian.v22i3.1514
Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems (IJIS), 1(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916
Udjianto, D., Hakim, A., Domai, T., Suryadi, S., & Hayat, H. (2021). Community Development and Economic Welfare through the Village Fund Policy. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.563
Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Peraturan Walikota Kediri Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Keenam Peraturan Walikota Kediri Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Fasilitasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat.
Wana, Q.-J., Feng, G.-F., Wang, H.-J., & Chang, C.-P. (2021). The Impacts of Democracy on Innovation: Revisited Evidence. Technovation, 108, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102333
Waskitijati, D., Handoyo, S., Wuryaningsih, C. D., Prasetyo, H. D., & Luwihono, S. (2016). Model Proses Penganggaran Pembangunan Desa secara Partisipatif. Lembaga Percik Salatiga.
Watajdid, N. I., Lathifah, A., Andini, D. S., & Fitroh, F. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Peran Media Sosial Instagram Terhadap Perkembangan Digital Marketing. Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Marketing Science), 20(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.14710/jspi.v20i2.163-179
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Journal of Society and Media
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract views: 357
,
PDF Downloads: 517
