Tindakan Kekerasan Guru Terhadap Siswa dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar (Studi Kasus di SMAN Surabaya)

Authors

  • Tamsil Muis Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n1.p86-90

Keywords:

kekerasan guru, interaksi belajar mengajar

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menghasilkan sebuah penjelasan teoritis tentang proses dan penyebab terjadinya tindakan kekerasan dengan menekankan pada dinamika interaksi belajar mengajar antara pelaku (guru) dan korban (siswa). Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dalam bentuk studi kasus, proses penelitian diawali dengan menggali informasi dari pejabat Diknas kota Surabaya (Pengawas Sekolah), penentuan sekolah terjadinya kekerasan di sekolah menurut rekomendasi Waslah kota Surabaya, penentuan guru-guru yang pernah melakukan kekerasan melalui angket dari siswa, kemudian wawancara dan observasi terhadap guru-guru yang sering melakukan kekerasan dalam proses belajar mengajar. Hasil analisis data penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Diknas Surabaya belum memiliki suatu sistem monitoring/pemantauan tentang kekerasan dalam interaksi belajar mengajar (kibem) di sekolah; (2) Guru-guru yang melakukan kibem, lebih disebabkan oleh paradigma dan wawasan kependidikannya, bahwa untuk menegakkan disiplin harus dengan kekerasan; (3) Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bentuk kekerasan yang sering terjadi di sekolah adalah kekerasan verbal (mengucapkan kata-kata kasar dan menyinggung perasaan), psikologis (mengabaikan, mengancam), dan fisik (menjewer, menendang, mencubit); (4) Siswa yang menjadi korban kekerasan menganggapnya sebagai sesuatu yang memang harus terjadi dan cenderung pasrah, hanya sebagian kecil siswa (10,6%) yang mengakibatkan rasa dendam dalam diri mereka 

 

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to get description about reason and happening process of violence in teaching learning process between teacher as subject and student as victim. Method of this research is qualitative research with case study design. Begin finding information from Departemen Pendididikan Nasional (Diknas) Surabaya, especially from the supervisor of school (usually called Pengawas Sekolah), this research corned in interview process with the teacher who known as a subject. The result of this research is (1) Diknas Surabaya havent monitoring system which concentrated in violence action in teaching learning process, (2) the cause of violence action is focused on paradigm and knowledge of the teacher that to built students discipline attitude is with violence action, (3) The kind of violence which happen in teaching learning process is verbal violence, physic violence, dan psychology violence, and (4) the victim of this violence action just can defensiveness and 10% getting resentment.

References

Berkowitz, L. 2003. Emotional Behavior. Mc. Graw-Hill Inc.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. 1998. Qualitative Researh for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Bogdan, R.C. & Taylor, S.T. 1975. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to The Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Covey, S. 1998. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens. New York: A Fireseide Book.

Creswell, J.W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Denzin, N.R. & Lincoln, Y.S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Ducks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Dollard, J. & Miller, N.E. 1950. Personality and Psychotherapy. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.

Flaherty, D.J. 2001. School Violence: Risk, Preventive Intervention and policy (Urban Diversity, series 109). Cleveland, OH: Case Western University.

Freud, S. 1953. Collected Papers. Vol. 1-5. Ed. E.Jones. London: Hogarth Press.

Gilligan, J. 1996. Violence as Tragedy. New York: Vintage Books.

Jessor, R.J., Van Den Bos, J., Vanderryn, J., Costa, F.M., & Turbin, M.S. 1995. Protective Factors In Adolescent Problem Behavior: Moderator Effects And Developmental Change. Developmental Psycology, 31. 923-933.

Johnson, David. 1998. œThe Determinants of Deadly Force: A Structural Analysis of Police Violence. American Journal of Sociology. Volume 103, Number 4: 211-217.

Joni, R.T. 1983. Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif, Wawasan Kependidikan dan Pembaharuan Pendidikan Guru. Pidato pengukuhan pada peresmian penerimaan jabatan guru besar FIP IKIP Malang.

Joni, R.T. 2000. Memicu Perbaikan Pendidikan Melalui Kurikulum. Basis. No. 07-08 tahun ke-49, Juli-Agustus 2000. Yogyakarta: Kanisius Halaman 41-48.

Knowles, R.T., & McLean, G.F. 1992. Psychological Foundations of Moral Education And Character Development: An Integrated Theory of Moral Development. Second Edition. Washington: The Council For Research In Values And Philosophy.
Kompas, 27 Juli 2005.

Lincoln. Y.S. & Guba, E.G.L. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Berverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Lorenz, K. 1971. Studies in Animal and Human Behavior. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Lorenz. 1963. On Agression. New York: Harcourt.

Marshall, C. & Rosman, G.B. 1989. Designing Qualitative Research.

Newbury Park. California: Sage Publications.Media Indonesia, 28 Nopember 2006.

Moleong. L.J. 1989. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Karya.
Newman, W.L. 2000. Social Research Methods: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Fourth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Smith. J.M. & Lusterman, D.D. 1979. The Teacher As Learning Fasilitator: Psychology and The Educational Process. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.

Strauss A., & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics Of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedurs and Techniques. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Yin, R. 1996. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-26

How to Cite

Muis, T. (2017). Tindakan Kekerasan Guru Terhadap Siswa dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar (Studi Kasus di SMAN Surabaya). JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori Dan Praktik, 2(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n1.p86-90
Abstract views: 6630 , PDF Downloads: 3133