Development of the Situationship Scale (SHTS): Measuring the Psychological Impact of Statusless Relationships

Authors

  • Faaruq Al Fattah Universitas Andalas
  • Siti Hafizhah Burhan Andalas University
  • Sahidatul Aulia Andalas University
  • Narissa Tria Ananda Andalas University
  • Syifa Yoza Andalas University
  • Shaucy Syach Yendri Andalas University
  • Reza Asep Purnomo State University of Surabaya
  • Zira Ajeng Ervianza Andalas University
  • Habibilla Ramizah Andalas University
  • Najla Calista Noer Andalas University
  • Nelia Afriyeni Andalas University
  • Weno Pratama Andalas University
  • Earlene Tania Rahma INTI International Universiy

Keywords:

Reliability, statusless relatuonship, situationship, validity

Abstract

Background: Situationships, or commitment-free relationships, are increasingly common among young people and have been linked to emotional distress and risky behaviors. However, there is a lack of quantitative tools to measure the extent and impact of these relationships, particularly among Indonesian youth. Objective: his study aims to develop a Situationship Scale to measure individuals' engagement levels in situationships and to provide insight into the psychological and social impacts of these relationships. Method: This quantitative study utilized a Likert-scale Situationship Scale (SHTS) and collected data from 200 adolescents aged 13 and above through an online questionnaire. Reliability and validity of the scale were assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and Aiken's V to ensure the psychometric quality of the instrument. Results: The Situationship Scale (SHTS) demonstrated strong reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.913 and satisfactory content validity, with an average Aiken's V of 0.81. Some items, however, showed low Corrected Item-Total Correlation values, indicating areas for improvement in item discrimination. Conclusion: The SHTS proves to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing statusless relationships, with potential applications in both psychological research and interventions. Future revisions and studies should focus on enhancing item effectiveness and testing with broader demographics to strengthen the instrument's generalizability.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and sychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Ansori, A. N. A. (2020). Lebih dari 80 persen remaja telah berpacaran, potensi kekerasan seksual pun meningkat. url: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/demografi/statistik/7ae7f59c2a738bb/proporsi-populasi-generasi-z-dan-milenial-terbesar-di-indonesia#. Accessed 2 April 2024

Ariadna, A. M., & Kesuma, A. I. (2023). Friends with benefit pada remaja di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Budaya: Tebar Science. 7 (3). 9-17. http://www.ejournal.tebarscience.com/index.php/JKSB/article/view/165

Ayun, Q. C. (2024). Mengenal arti situationship dan cara mengatasinya. Better Parent https://betterparent.id/situationship/# . Accessed 2 April 2024

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan validitas item. Buletin Psikologi, 3(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.13381

Azwar, S. (2021). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar

Azzizah, A. N. (2020). Friends with benefit: Agensi seksual kaum muda dalam kontestasi nilai dan norma. Skripsi. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Program Studi Sosiologi. Universitas Indonesia. Depok. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Indeks kesenjangan gender 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik. Becker-Phelps, L. (2014). Insecure in love: How anxious attachment can make you feel jealous, needy, and worried and what you can do about it. New Harbinger Publications.

Choudhry, V., Petteerson, O. K., Emmelin, M., Muchunguzi, C., Agardh, A. (2022). Relationships on campus are situationships’: A grounded theory study of sexual relationships at a Ugandan university. Plos One. 17(7):1-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271495

Crocker, L. (2012). Introduction to measurement theory. In Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 371-384). Routledge.

Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2020). Marital quality assessment: Reviewing the concept, instruments, and methods. Marriage & Family Review, 56(3), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2020.1712300

Ellis, W. E., & Dumas, T. M. (2018). Peers over parents? How peer relationships influence dating violence. In Adolescent dating violence (pp. 105-133). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811797-2.00005-0.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for estimating reliability. but…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Ibda, F. (2015). Perkembangan kognitif: teori jean piaget. Intelektualita, 3(1), 27-38.

Jarvis, M. (2011). Teori-teori psikologi. Nusa Media.

Jayani, D. H. (2021). Sensus penduduk 2020: Penduduk indonesia didominasi gen z dan milenial. url: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/01/22/sensus-penduduk-2020-penduduk-indonesia-didominasi-gen-z-dan-milenial.

Kautsar, A. (2024). Makin banyak remaja ri yang seks sebelum nikah, bisa seserius ini dampaknya. url: https://health.detik.com/berita-detikhealth/d-7237039/makin-banyak-remaja-ri-yang-seks-sebelum-nikah-bisa-seserius-ini-dampaknya. Accesed 2 April 2024

Leban, L., & Gibson, C. L. (2020). The role of gender in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and delinquency and substance use in adolescence. Journal of criminal justice, 66, 101637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101637

Mirsu-Paun, A., & Oliver, J. A. (2017). How much does love really hurt? a meta-analysis of the association between romantic relationship quality, breakups and mental health outcomes in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Relationships Research, 8, e5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2017.6

Muniruzzaman, M. (2017). Transformation of intimacy and its impact in developing countries. Life Sci Soc Policy. 13(10). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0056-8

Pushkar, S. & Singh, P. (2023). Development and validation of situationship scale: preliminary phase. Journal of Propulsion Technology. 44(3):97-112.

Ramadani, A. F., & Alamiyah, S. S. (2023). Analisis resepsi mahasiswa surabaya terhadap hubungan friends with benefits dalam drama korea. Jurnal Komunikasi Universitas Garut: Hasil Pemikiran dan Penelitian, 9(1), 1031-1046.

Santrock, J.W. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan (edisi kedua). (Penerj. Tri Wibowo B.S). Jakarta: Kencana.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supratiknya, A. (2014). Pengukuran psikologis. Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Weyant, E. (2022). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edition: by john w. creswell and j. david creswell, los angeles. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231

Winarsunu, T. 2009. Statistik dalam penelitian psikologi dan pendidikan. UMM Press.

Yudia, S. M., Cahyo, K., & Kusumawati, A. (2018). Perilaku seksual pranikah pada mahasiswa kost (studi kasus pada perguruan tinggi “x” di wilayah jakarta barat). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(1), 819-825. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkm.v6i1.20324

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Al Fattah, F., Burhan, S. H., Aulia, S., Ananda, N. T., Yoza, S., Yendri, S. S., … Rahma, E. T. (2025). Development of the Situationship Scale (SHTS): Measuring the Psychological Impact of Statusless Relationships. Indonesian Journal of Sports and Health Psychology, 1(02), 66–74. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/indojshp/article/view/35913

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 02 (2025): IndoJSHP

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Faaruq Al Fattah, Siti Hafizhah Burhan, Sahidatul Aulia, Narissa Tria Ananda, Syifa Yoza, Shaucy Syach Yendri, Reza Asep Purnomo, Zira Ajeng Ervianza, Habibilla Ramizah, Najla Calista Noer, Nelia Afriyeni, Weno Pratama, Earlene Tania Rahma

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract views: 978 , PDF Downloads: 789