Dwangsom (Coerced Money) In Cases of Child Execution Due to Divorce: A Study of the Supreme Court Decision Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023
Dwangsom (Uang Paksa) dalam Kasus Eksekusi Hak Asuh Anak Akibat Perceraian: Sebuah Studi atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1026 K/Ag/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/ijalgov.v3i2.55438Keywords:
Dwangsom, Execution Right Foster Care Child, Justice, Ex Officio Judge.Abstract
The implementation of execution (hadhanah) in Indonesia still faces unclear norms, especially because children cannot be treated as objects of execution like objects as stated in Article 1033 Rv (Reglemen op de Rechtsvordering), one of which is namely in the Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023. Formulation problems in research This namely: First, how urgency implementation dwangsom (money force) in constraint implementation execution decision right foster care child (hadhanah) in Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 and second, how the judge's authority in set dwangsom (money force) in the case right foster care child (hadlanah) according to law positive in Indonesia. Goal study This For urgency implementation dwangsom (money force) in constraint implementation execution decision right foster care child (hadhanah) in Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 and the authority of judges in set dwangsom (money force) in the case right foster care child (hadlanah) according to law positive in Indonesia. Method research used is study juridical normative. Research results show that the application of dwangsom in the Supreme Court Decision Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 is valid and important to be implemented as an effort to guarantee the implementation of child custody (hadhanah) execution. This application is in line with Article 606 a and 606 Rv (Reglement op de burgerlijke rechtvordering), Article 259 paragraph (1) RBg Results of the National Working Meeting (RAKERNAS) of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in Manado in 2012. In addition, based on the Supreme Court Decision Number: 556/K/SIP/1971 dated January 8, 1972, and the Supreme Court Number: 291/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Klk, the Judge is allowed to decide beyond the petitum as long as it is for the sake of justice, so that it does not violate the principle of ultra petita. This application is also in line with the Islamic fiqh principle of Dar'ul Mafasid Muqoddamun 'Al-Jarbil Masalih.
References
Arne Huzaimah. “Reformulasi Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Hadhanah.” Jurnal Nurani 18, No. 2 (2018): 227–244.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra, Dicky Eko Prasetio, Briggs Samuel, And Mawunyo Nutakor. “The Problematics Of The Legal Standing Of Deoxyribonucleic Acid ( DNA ) Test Results Concerning Civil Relationships Of Illegitimate Children : A Legal Pluralism Perspective.” Mizani 11, No. 02 (2024): 435–448.
Dr. Drs. H.A Mukti Arto, S.H., M.Hum Dan Ernamita Alfiah, S.H., M.H. Urgensi Dwangsom Dalam Eksekusi Hadhanah (Edisi Pertama). Edited By Wtnasari. Cetakan Ke. KENCANA, 2018.
Firdaus. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyyah; Membahas Kaidah-Kaidah Pokok Dan Populer Fiqh. Al-Qawaid Al-Fiqhiyyah; Membahas Kaidah-Kaidah Pokok Dan Populer Fiqh, 2015.
Fitri, Nelly Layaliyal. “Eksekusi Hak Asuh Anak Di Dua Wilayahyuridiksi Prespektif Undang-Undangperlindungan Anak No 35 Tahun 2014(Studi Putusan Nomor 1813/Pdt.G/PA.Kab.Kediri).” Sakina: Journal Of Family Studies 3, No. 1 (2019).
Gaffar, Salahuddin, Agus Mulya Karsona, Yani Pujiwati, And Indra Perwira. “The Concept Of Procedural Law Regarding The Implementation Of Collective Agreements With Legal Certainty In Termination Of Employment In Indonesia.” Heliyon 7, No. 4 (2021): E06690. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Heliyon.2021.E06690.
Huzaimah, Arne, And Syaiful Aziz. “Urgensi Penerapan Lembaga Dwangsom (Uang Paksa) Pada Perkara Hadhânah Di Pengadilan Agama Dalam Perspektif Maqâshid Al-Syarî’ah.” Al-’Adalah 15, No. 1 (2018): 125.
Masnun, Muh. Ali, Prasetio, Dicky Eko, Maalikatussofa. “Reconstruction Of The Normative Legal Research Paradigm In Responding To Global Challenges: An Epistemological Analysis.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 12, No. 3 (2025): 372–384.
Muhsim, Muhamad Ali, Erfaniah Zuhriah, And Ali Hamdan. “Penerapan Dwangsom Pada Putusan Hak Asuh Anak Perspektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 7, No. 2 (2022): 124–150.
Nisa, S. “Pengasuhan Anak Pada Keluarga Tki Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Di Desa Songgom Lor Kecamatan Songgom Kabupaten Brebes)” (2023).
Nurul Hikmah, Syahid Akhmad Faisol, Dicky Eko Prasetio, Kamaluddin Nurdin Marjuni, Mochamad Ikwan. “Professional Waqf 5.0: Penta Helix Strategy And Legal Pluralism In The Digital Era.” Krtha Bhayangkara 20, No. 1 (2026): 173-194.
Pipit Muliyah, Dyah Aminatun, Sukma Septian Nasution, Tommy Hastomo, Setiana Sri Wahyuni Sitepu, Tryana. “済無No Title No Title No Title.” Journal GEEJ 7, No. 2 (2020).
Prasetio, Dicky Eko, Muh. Ali Masnun, And Noviyanti Noviyanti. “Post-Election Reconciliation In 2024 As A Constitutional Convention In Indonesia: A Progressive Legal Culture Perspective.” Jambura Law Review 7, No. 1 (January 31, 2025): 176–196. Https://Ejurnal.Ung.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jalrev/Article/View/26999.
Swastiastu, Om. “Pedoman Eksekusi” (2019).
Utari, Indah Sri, Ubaidillah Kamal, Diandra Preludio Ramada, Benny Sumardiana, And Bhanu Prakash Nunna. “Legal Protection For Child Sexual Violence Victims: Victimology Perspectives, Challenges, And Policy Solutions In Asia.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 8, No. 1 (March 4, 2026): 40–77. Https://Journal.Unesa.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Suarahukum/Article/View/48307.
Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya. “Kekuasaan Diskresi Hakim Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.” Veritas Et Justitia 7, No. 1 (2021): 31–55.
Widowati, And Vu Le Giang. “Child Punishment Versus The Principle Of Non-Discrimination In The Perspective Of Human Rights: A Legal Comparison Between Indonesia And Vietnam.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 7, No. 1 (May 11, 2025): 245–273. Https://Journal.Unesa.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Suarahukum/Article/View/40024.
Widyawati, Anis, Muhammad Azil Maskur, Rohadhatul Aisy, Papontee Teeraphan, And Heru Setyanto. “The Urgency Of Supervision Institutions In Implementing Prisoners’ Rights As An Effort To Restructure Criminal Execution Laws.” Jambura Law Review 7, No. 1 (January 5, 2025): 127–151. Https://Ejurnal.Ung.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jalrev/Article/View/27595.
William, Jl, Iskandar Ps, Medan Estate, Kec Percut, Sei Tuan, And Kabupaten Deli Serdang. “Penghalang Pernikahan ( Rabaib / Anak Bawaan Istri ) Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara , Indonesia” 2 (2025).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marcella Selvi Arliani, Nurul Hikmah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 1
,
PDF Downloads: 0
