Competence of the State Administrative Court in Resolving Disputes Concerning Unlawful Acts by the Government

Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa terkait Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Pemerintah

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ijalgov.v3i2.55434

Keywords:

Authority, Settlement Dispute, Action Against the Law by the Government

Abstract

Structurally, Indonesian state institutions have many interrelated components. State institutions have undergone numerous policy adaptations and reforms since independence and continue through the post-reform era. The State Administrative Court, one of the state institutions under the authority of the Supreme Court, was the last judicial system established in Indonesia, in line with the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court. As one of the most recently established courts, it certainly requires a number of relevant adaptations and reforms to the judicial process in practice. One of these updates is explained in Article 1 number 4 of Supreme Court Regulation number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Settling Disputes Regarding Government Actions and the Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Acts by Government Officials that Disputes Regarding Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and/or Officials ( Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad ) is a dispute that contains a demand to declare the actions of a Government Official invalid and/or void, or not having binding legal force along with compensation in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. Thus, it is necessary to have an explanation regarding the authority, as well as the limits of the authority of the State Administrative Court that adjudicates disputes regarding government actions, along with a systematic dispute resolution process that is in accordance with relevant laws.

References

Agus Budi Susilo. “Makna Dan Kriteria Diskresi Keputusan Dan/Atau Tindakan Pejabat Publik Dalam Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan Yang Baik.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (2015): 140.

Bagus Oktavian Abrianto, et-al. “Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014.” Negara Hukum 11, no. 1 (2020): 50.

Bibianus Hengky Widhi Antoro. “Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Di PTUN.” Jurnal Yudisial 13, no. 2 (2020): 208.

Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. “Catatan Evaluasi Undang-Undang No.30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintah.” PTUN Mataram, 2023.

———. “Dispute Settlement in the Ombudsman and the Court of Law Regarding Compensation Public Service Dispute.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 10, no. 2 (2021): 281.

Dicky Eko Prasetio, Muh Ali Masnun, Bayangsari Wedhatami. “Legal Uncertainty of Golf Game as Sports and Entertainment Branch in Local Tax Imposition.” Wawasan Yuridika 4, no. 1 (2024): 76–93.

Enrico Simanjuntak. “Restatement Tentang Yurisdiksi Peradilan Mengadili Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah.” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum 48, no. 1 (2019): 44.

Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara & Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo. “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Ptun Dan Implikasi Dalam Pelaksanaannya.” Jurnal IUS 2, no. 4 (2014): 165.

H.D. Van Wijk. Hoofdstukken van Administratief Recht. Utrecht: Uitvegerij Lemma BV, 1995.

Hadjon, Philipus M., Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, G.H. Addink, and J.B.J.M. Ten Berge. Hukum Administrasi Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Cetakan Ke. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2012.

Hari Sugiharto dan Bagus Oktafian Abrianto. “Upaya Administratif Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Arena Hukum 11, no. 1 (2018): 30.

Hendi Setiawan, Et-al. “Some Commentary Notes On Law Number 30 Of 2014 Concerning Government Administration.” Simbur Cahaya 31, no. 2 (2024): 280.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2005.

Masnun, Muh. Ali, Dicky Eko Prasetio, Denial Ikram, and Puja Aqdamuyasyaro P. “Legal Reform of Legal Profession Amidst the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia: The Perspective of Mesu Budi’s Philosophy of Law.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 2 (2025): 277–287.

Maximus Watung. “Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad Dalam Praktik Peradilan Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Lex Et Societatis 6, no. 1 (2018): 50.

Muh. Ali Masnun, Dicky Eko Prasetio. “Reconstruction of The Concept of Authority in Administrative Law Related to National Strategic Projects Based on Substantive Justice.” Mimbar Keadilan 19, no. 2 (2026): 259–281.

Muh. Ali Masnun, et-al. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Vaksin Covid-19 Dan Tanggung Jawab Negara Pemenuhan Vaksin Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Kesejahteraan.” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 1 (2021): 39.

Muhamad Raziv Barokah & Anna Erliyana. “Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut Dari P Ompetensi Absolut Dari Peradilan Umum K Adilan Umum Ke Peradilan T Adilan Tata Usaha Negar Ata Usaha Negara: Gugatan P a: Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Erbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2021): 825.

Muklis Al’anam. “Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Administrasi Indonesia Dan Jerman.” Proceeding of Airlangga Faculty of Law Colloquium 1 (2024): 400.

Muklis Al’anam & Lanny Ramli. “The Expansion of the Absolute Competence of Administrative Courts: A Comparative Legal Study with the French Conseil d’État.” Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government (IJALGOV) 1, no. 2 (2024): 36.

Philipus M. Hadjon. “Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 TH. 2014 Tentang Administasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 4, no. 1 (2015): 53.

Prasetio, Dicky Eko, and Muh. Ali Masnun. “Beneficiary Pays Principle : Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Pelindungan Lingkungan Dalam Mewujudkan Kelestarian Sumber Daya Air.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 11, no. 1 (October 9, 2025): 1–22. https://jhli.icel.or.id/jhli/article/view/957.

Prasetio, Dicky Eko, Muh. Ali Masnun, and Noviyanti Noviyanti. “Post-Election Reconciliation in 2024 as a Constitutional Convention in Indonesia: A Progressive Legal Culture Perspective.” Jambura Law Review 7, no. 1 (January 31, 2025): 176–196. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/26999.

Prasetio, Dicky Eko, Muh. Ali Masnun, and Hananto Widodo. “Affirmative Action for Persons with Disabilities to Ensure the Right to Be Elected in General Elections.” Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 1, no. 1 (May 2, 2025): 205–210. https://nstproceeding.com/index.php/nuscientech/article/view/1350.

Putrijanti, Aju -. “The Competence of the Administrative Court and Administrative Justice.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 2 (April 2020): 97–112.

Ridwan HR. “Perluasan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 25, no. 2 (2018): 343.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Tranformasi Dan Refleksi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Sjahran Basah. Eksistensi Dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi Di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1985.

Sri Nur Hari Susanto. “Good Governance Dalam Konteks Hukum Administrasi.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 213.

Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, et-al. “The Government Responsibilities in Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic and Improving the Declining Economy in Indonesia.” IJEBD: International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development 5, no. 2 (2022).

Titik Triwulan & Ismu Gunadi Widodo. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Utrecht, E. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia Cet-8. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas, 2020.

Widodo, Hananto, Dicky Eko Prasetio, Ridwan Arma Subagyo, and Sunanta Chemaming. “Legal Implications of the Authority of Acting Regional Heads Based on Policy Regulations.” Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government 1, no. 1 (November 9, 2024): 65–81. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijalgov/article/view/35774.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-06
Abstract views: 11 , PDF Downloads: 3

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.